These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. U.S. cesarean and VBAC rates stalled in the mid-1990s. Curtin SC; Kozak LJ; Gregory KD Birth; 2000 Mar; 27(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 10865562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Epidemiology of cesarean delivery: the scope of the problem. Boyle A; Reddy UM Semin Perinatol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):308-14. PubMed ID: 23009961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recent trends and patterns in cesarean and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States. MacDorman M; Declercq E; Menacker F Clin Perinatol; 2011 Jun; 38(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 21645788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vaginal birth after cesarean section in a rural private setting. Bussinger EK Nebr Med J; 1993 Nov; 78(11):358-60. PubMed ID: 8309486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends and patterns of vaginal birth after cesarean availability in the United States. Gregory KD; Fridman M; Korst L Semin Perinatol; 2010 Aug; 34(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 20654773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of public accountability on hospital performance: trends in rates for cesarean sections and vaginal births after cesarean section in Cleveland, Ohio. Caron A; Neuhauser D Qual Manag Health Care; 1999; 7(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 10346457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section. Stafford RS JAMA; 1991 Jan; 265(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 1984126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. US hospitals are reducing early elective deliveries. Tanne JH BMJ; 2013 Mar; 346():f1417. PubMed ID: 23460660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes. MacDorman MF; Menacker F; Declercq E Clin Perinatol; 2008 Jun; 35(2):293-307, v. PubMed ID: 18456070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Green Bay cesarean section study. III. Falling cesarean birth rates without a formal curtailment program. Sandmire HF; DeMott RK Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1790-9; discussion 1799-802. PubMed ID: 8203440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth. Soliman SR; Burrows RF CMAJ; 1993 Apr; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends and patterns in cesarean section rates in Rhode Island. Viner-Brown SI; Cain R Med Health R I; 2006 Jun; 89(6):215-6. PubMed ID: 16875011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Germany from 1990 to 2012: a population-based study. Kyvernitakis I; Reichelt J; Kyvernitakis A; Misselwitz B; Hadji P; Schmidt S; Kalder M Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2014 Oct; 218(5):203-9. PubMed ID: 25353214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a health policy perspective. Sachs BP Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Sep; 44(3):553-60. PubMed ID: 11685879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The risk of prelabor and intrapartum cesarean delivery among overweight and obese women: possible preventive actions. Hermann M; Le Ray C; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):241.e1-9. PubMed ID: 25108139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in cesarean delivery in the United States, 1988 and 1993. Clarke SC; Taffel S Birth; 1995 Jun; 22(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 7779224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]