BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20959769)

  • 1. Do the adjacent level intervertebral discs degenerate after a lumbar spinal fusion? An experimental study using a rabbit model.
    Higashino K; Hamasaki T; Kim JH; Okada M; Yoon ST; Boden SD; Hutton WC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Oct; 35(22):E1144-52. PubMed ID: 20959769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adjacent segment degeneration: observations in a goat spinal fusion study.
    Hoogendoorn RJ; Helder MN; Wuisman PI; Bank RA; Everts VE; Smit TH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(12):1337-43. PubMed ID: 18496346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The clinical characteristics and risk factors for the adjacent segment degeneration in instrumented lumbar fusion.
    Min JH; Jang JS; Jung Bj; Lee HY; Choi WC; Shim CS; Choi G; Lee SH
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jul; 21(5):305-9. PubMed ID: 18600137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Birch N; Shaw M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jan; 29(1):106-7. PubMed ID: 14699286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re: Sasso RC, Burkus JK, LeHuec JC. Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:1023-6.
    Smoljanovic T; Bojanic I; Rakovac M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(14):E622; author reply E623. PubMed ID: 20551783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accelerated degeneration after failed cervical and lumbar nucleoplasty.
    Cuellar VG; Cuellar JM; Vaccaro AR; Carragee EJ; Scuderi GJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Dec; 23(8):521-4. PubMed ID: 21131800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments after Dynesys dynamic stabilization system after two years.
    Kumar A; Beastall J; Hughes J; Karadimas EJ; Nicol M; Smith F; Wardlaw D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(26):2909-14. PubMed ID: 19092623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Innervation of anulus tears: an experimental animal study.
    Fagan AB; Sarvestani G; Moore RJ; Fraser RD; Vernon-Roberts B; Blumbergs PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(12):1200-5. PubMed ID: 20445481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion?
    Hilibrand AS; Robbins M
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):190S-194S. PubMed ID: 15541666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finite element analysis in adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion.
    Yan JZ; Qiu GX; Wu ZH; Wang XS; Xing ZJ
    Int J Med Robot; 2011 Mar; 7(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 21284074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Instrumented posterior lumbar fusion outcomes for lumbar degenerative disorders in a southern European, semirural population.
    Brotis AG; Paterakis KN; Tsiamalou PM; Fountas KN; Hahjigeorgiou GM; Karavelis A
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Oct; 23(7):444-50. PubMed ID: 20921872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic bulging of intervertebral discs in the degenerative lumbar spine.
    Zou J; Yang H; Miyazaki M; Morishita Y; Wei F; McGovern S; Wang JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2545-50. PubMed ID: 19841611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comment on the paper "Contralateral radiculopathy after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion" (Travis Hunt et al.).
    Bach CM
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Dec; 16 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):315. PubMed ID: 17520300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Anterior approach for disc excision and interbody fusion for protruded lumbar intervertebral disc].
    Shao X
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1982 Sep; 20(9):544-6. PubMed ID: 7172910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relation between sagittal morphology of the lumbosacral spine and the degree of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration.
    Ergün T; Lakadamyalı H; Sahin MS
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 21252606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature.
    Schulte TL; Lerner T; Hackenberg L; Liljenqvist U; Bullmann V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):E645-8. PubMed ID: 18090074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disc space injection with marcaine as a method to evaluate painful nonunion of an interbody fusion device: a case report.
    Ploumis A; Pinto MR; Schellhas KP
    Spine J; 2007; 7(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 17197336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure.
    Sasso RC; Kenneth Burkus J; LeHuec JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 May; 28(10):1023-6. PubMed ID: 12768143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The restoration of lumbar intervertebral disc load distribution: a comparison of three nucleus replacement technologies.
    Dahl MC; Ahrens M; Sherman JE; Martz EO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul; 35(15):1445-53. PubMed ID: 20216342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc.
    Denozière G; Ku DN
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(4):766-75. PubMed ID: 16439247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.