133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20959977)
1. CT colonography: patient tolerance of laxative free fecal tagging regimen versus traditional cathartic cleansing.
Buccicardi D; Grosso M; Caviglia I; Gastaldo A; Carbone S; Neri E; Bartolozzi C; Quadri P
Abdom Imaging; 2011 Oct; 36(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 20959977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance.
Nagata K; Okawa T; Honma A; Endo S; Kudo SE; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):780-9. PubMed ID: 19375954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium.
Lefere P; Gryspeerdt S; Marrannes J; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1836-42. PubMed ID: 15908539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of two minimal-preparation regimes for CT colonography: optimising image quality and patient acceptability.
Pollentine A; Mortimer A; McCoubrie P; Archer L
Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):1085-92. PubMed ID: 22422379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computed tomography colonography: Retrospective comparison of laxative plus barium tagging versus iodinated contrast only for bowel preparation and faecal tagging.
Perry E; Moore H; Reeve J
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Apr; 63(2):203-211. PubMed ID: 30785667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Performance and Patient Acceptance of Reduced-Laxative CT Colonography for the Detection of Polypoid and Non-Polypoid Neoplasms: A Multicenter Prospective Trial.
Utano K; Nagata K; Honda T; Mitsushima T; Yasuda T; Kato T; Horita S; Asano M; Oda N; Majima K; Kawamura Y; Hirayama M; Watanabe N; Kanazawa H; Lefor AK; Sugimoto H
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 27580426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual-energy based spectral electronic cleansing in non-cathartic computed tomography colonography: an emerging novel technique.
Eliahou R; Azraq Y; Carmi R; Mahgerefteh SY; Sosna J
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2010 Aug; 31(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 20691931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fluid tagging for CT colonography: effectiveness of a 2-hour iodinated oral preparation after incomplete optical colonoscopy.
Chang KJ; Rekhi SS; Anderson SW; Soto JA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 21160430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low-volume hybrid bowel preparation combining saline laxatives with oral contrast agents versus standard polyethylene glycol lavage for colonoscopy.
Lawrence EM; Pickhardt PJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Aug; 53(8):1176-81. PubMed ID: 20628282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reducing the oral contrast dose in CT colonography: evaluation of faecal tagging quality and patient acceptance.
Liedenbaum MH; Denters MJ; Zijta FM; van Ravesteijn VF; Bipat S; Vos FM; Dekker E; Stoker J
Clin Radiol; 2011 Jan; 66(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 21147296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tagging-based, electronically cleansed CT colonography: evaluation of patient comfort and image readability.
Zalis ME; Perumpillichira JJ; Magee C; Kohlberg G; Hahn PF
Radiology; 2006 Apr; 239(1):149-59. PubMed ID: 16567485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT colonography with decreased purgation: balancing preparation, performance, and patient acceptance.
Mahgerefteh S; Fraifeld S; Blachar A; Sosna J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1531-9. PubMed ID: 19933644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A simplified approach to virtual colonoscopy using different intestinal preparations: preliminary experience with regard to quality, accuracy and patient acceptability.
Faccioli N; Foti G; Barillari M; Zaccarella A; Camera L; Biasiutti C; Pozzi Mucelli R
Radiol Med; 2011 Aug; 116(5):749-58. PubMed ID: 21424566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT colonography with reduced bowel preparation after incomplete colonoscopy in the elderly.
Iafrate F; Hassan C; Zullo A; Stagnitti A; Ferrari R; Spagnuolo A; Laghi A
Eur Radiol; 2008 Jul; 18(7):1385-95. PubMed ID: 18351357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy and tolerability of contrast enhanced CT colonoscopy in symptomatic patients with increased risk for colorectal cancer.
Ozsunar Y; Coskun G; Delibaş N; Uz B; Yükselen V
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 18597964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laxative-free CT colonography.
Slater A; Betts M; D'Costa H
Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):e410-5. PubMed ID: 22167512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual-energy index value of luminal air in fecal-tagging computed tomography colonography: findings and impact on electronic cleansing.
Cai W; Zhang D; Lee JG; Shirai Y; Kim SH; Yoshida H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 23493207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT colonography without cathartic preparation: positive predictive value and patient experience in clinical practice.
Zueco Zueco C; Sobrido Sampedro C; Corroto JD; Rodriguez Fernández P; Fontanillo Fontanillo M
Eur Radiol; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1195-204. PubMed ID: 22246146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population.
Jensch S; de Vries AH; Peringa J; Bipat S; Dekker E; Baak LC; Bartelsman JF; Heutinck A; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 18292475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An interview study analysing patients' experiences and perceptions of non-laxative or full-laxative preparation with faecal tagging prior to CT colonography.
Ghanouni A; Smith SG; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Plumb A; Boone D; von Wagner C
Clin Radiol; 2013 May; 68(5):472-8. PubMed ID: 23265916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
