156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2096022)
1. Contact sensitization of mice to nickel sulphate and potassium dichromate.
Kimber I; Bentley AN; Hilton J
Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Nov; 23(5):325-30. PubMed ID: 2096022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Positive patch test reactions to nickel, cobalt, and potassium dichromate in a series of 576 patients.
Massone L; Anonide A; Borghi S; Isola V
Cutis; 1991 Feb; 47(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 2001632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. False-positive, follicular and irritant patch test reactions to metal salts.
Fischer T; Rystedt I
Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Feb; 12(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 3157537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of contact sensitivity of metal salts using the murine local lymph node assay.
Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Toxicol Lett; 1992 Aug; 62(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 1509507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences of draining lymph node cell proliferation among mice, rats and guinea pigs following exposure to metal allergens.
Ikarashi Y; Ohno K; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Toxicology; 1992 Dec; 76(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 1471161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of temperature on the concentration homogeneity of patch test materials.
Goh CL; Kwok SF
Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Oct; 15(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 3802807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changing patterns of contact sensitivity in Sofia.
Stransky L; Krasteva M
Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1989; 37(6):214-6. PubMed ID: 2606007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Follow-up study of patients with contact dermatitis caused by chromates, nickel, and cobalt.
Dooms-Goossens A; Ceuterick A; Vanmaele N; Degreef H
Dermatologica; 1980; 160(4):249-60. PubMed ID: 7358190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The reproducibility of nickel, cobalt and chromate sensitization in patients tested at least twice in the period 1992-2014 with TRUE Test®.
Schaeffer AC; Andersen KE; Bindslev-Jensen C; Mortz CG
Contact Dermatitis; 2016 Aug; 75(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 27385519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Positive nickel patch tests do not intensify positive reactions to adjacent patch tests with dichromate. Results from a double-blind multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Brasch J; Kreilgård B; Henseler T; Aberer W; Fuchs T; Pflüger R; Hoeck U; Gefeller O
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Sep; 43(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 10985630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in the pattern of sensitization to common contact allergens in denmark between 1985-86 and 1997-98, with a special view to the effect of preventive strategies.
Johansen Jd; Menné T; Christophersen J; Kaaber K; Veien N
Br J Dermatol; 2000 Mar; 142(3):490-5. PubMed ID: 10735956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Examination of a vehicle for use with water soluble materials in the murine local lymph node assay.
Ryan CA; Cruse LW; Skinner RA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Gerberick GF
Food Chem Toxicol; 2002 Nov; 40(11):1719-25. PubMed ID: 12176099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shoe contact dermatitis.
Angelini G; Vena GA; Meneghini CL
Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Jun; 6(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 7398288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Change in the allergen spectrum in contact eczema 1975-1984].
Gailhofer G; Ludvan M
Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1987; 35(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 2952479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Allergic contact dermatitis in children.
Weston WL; Weston JA
Am J Dis Child; 1984 Oct; 138(10):932-6. PubMed ID: 6383018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fifty years experience with contact dermatitis.
Fisher AA
Cutis; 1977 Jan; 19(1):18-20, 26-32. PubMed ID: 138574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Strip patch test vs. conventional patch test: investigation of dose-dependent test sensitivities in nickel- and chromium-sensitive subjects.
Dickel H; Kamphowe J; Geier J; Altmeyer P; Kuss O
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 19470058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of routine office patch testing.
Lepine EM
Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Apr; 2(2):89-91. PubMed ID: 1017185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of the ear swelling test and the local lymph node assay in hamsters.
Clottens FL; Breyssens A; De Raeve H; Demedts M; Nemery B
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 1996 Jun; 35(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 8782095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Skin reactivity in subjects sensitive to different concentrations of nickel, chromium and cobalt].
Piela Z; Kieć-Swierczyńska M
Med Pr; 1998; 49(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 9919605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]