BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20960364)

  • 1. Reliability and discriminative ability of a modified Wingate rowing test in 12- to 18-year-old rowers.
    Mikulic P; Emersic D; Markovic G
    J Sports Sci; 2010 Nov; 28(13):1409-14. PubMed ID: 20960364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age- and gender-associated variation in maximal-intensity exercise performance in adolescent rowers.
    Mikulic P; Markovic G
    Int J Sports Med; 2011 May; 32(5):373-8. PubMed ID: 21380965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of specific anaerobic power in 12-14-year-old male rowers.
    Mikulić P; Ruzić L; Marković G
    J Sci Med Sport; 2009 Nov; 12(6):662-6. PubMed ID: 18762452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modification of the Wingate anaerobic power test for rowing: optimization of the resistance setting.
    Mandic S; Quinney HA; Bell GJ
    Int J Sports Med; 2004 Aug; 25(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 15346227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Conconi test: a controversial concept for the determination of the anaerobic threshold in young rowers.
    Bourgois J; Vrijens J
    Int J Sports Med; 1998 Nov; 19(8):553-9. PubMed ID: 9877147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of anaerobic capacity in rowers using Wingate test on cycle and rowing ergometer.
    Klasnja A; Barak O; Popadić-Gaćesa J; Drapsin M; Knezević A; Grujić N
    Med Pregl; 2010; 63(9-10):620-3. PubMed ID: 21443056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The 1,500-m Rowing Performance is Highly Dependent on Modified Wingate Anaerobic Test Performance in National-Level Adolescent Rowers.
    Maciejewski H; Rahmani A; Chorin F; Lardy J; Giroux C; Ratel S
    Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2016 Nov; 28(4):572-579. PubMed ID: 27633491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of 2000 m indoor rowing performance using a 30 s sprint and maximal oxygen uptake.
    Riechman SE; Zoeller RF; Balasekaran G; Goss FL; Robertson RJ
    J Sports Sci; 2002 Sep; 20(9):681-7. PubMed ID: 12200919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Critical velocity: a predictor of 2000-m rowing ergometer performance in NCAA D1 female collegiate rowers.
    Kendall KL; Smith AE; Fukuda DH; Dwyer TR; Stout JR
    J Sports Sci; 2011 Jun; 29(9):945-50. PubMed ID: 21574097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High reliability of performance of well-trained rowers on a rowing ergometer.
    Schabort EJ; Hawley JA; Hopkins WG; Blum H
    J Sports Sci; 1999 Aug; 17(8):627-32. PubMed ID: 10487463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of instrumented tank rowing for objective assessment of rowing performance.
    Henry JC; Clark RR; McCabe RP; Vanderby R
    J Sports Sci; 1995 Jun; 13(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 7563286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scaling concept II rowing ergometer performance for differences in body mass to better reflect rowing in water.
    Nevill AM; Beech C; Holder RL; Wyon M
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2010 Feb; 20(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 19210670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between selected physiological variables of rowers and rowing performance as determined by a 2000 m ergometer test.
    Cosgrove MJ; Wilson J; Watt D; Grant SF
    J Sports Sci; 1999 Nov; 17(11):845-52. PubMed ID: 10585164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stroke power consistency and 2000 m rowing performance in varsity rowers.
    Shimoda M; Fukunaga T; Higuchi M; Kawakami Y
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2009 Feb; 19(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 18248542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What distinguishes the Olympic level heavyweight rowers from other internationally successful rowers?
    Mikulić P; Ruzić L; Oreb G
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Sep; 31(3):811-6. PubMed ID: 18041393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling the determinants of 2000 m rowing ergometer performance: a proportional, curvilinear allometric approach.
    Nevill AM; Allen SV; Ingham SA
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2011 Feb; 21(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 19883389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strength testing and training of rowers: a review.
    Lawton TW; Cronin JB; McGuigan MR
    Sports Med; 2011 May; 41(5):413-32. PubMed ID: 21510717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodological Considerations on the Relationship Between the 1,500-m Rowing Ergometer Performance and Vertical Jump in National-Level Adolescent Rowers.
    Maciejewski H; Rahmani A; Chorin F; Lardy J; Samozino P; Ratel S
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3000-3007. PubMed ID: 29533359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting the 1000m rowing ergometer performance in 12-13-year-old rowers: the basis for selection process?
    Mikulić P; Ruzić L
    J Sci Med Sport; 2008 Apr; 11(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 17543582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Force-time characteristics of the rowing stroke and corresponding physiological muscle adaptations.
    Roth W; Schwanitz P; Pas P; Bauer P
    Int J Sports Med; 1993 Sep; 14 Suppl 1():S32-4. PubMed ID: 8262705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.