427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20962195)
21. [The mid-term follow-up of revision total knee athroplasty].
Chen X; Lyu H; Sun T
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 53(10):757-62. PubMed ID: 26654308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pain and function in patients after primary unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty.
Lygre SH; Espehaug B; Havelin LI; Furnes O; Vollset SE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Dec; 92(18):2890-7. PubMed ID: 21159989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The importance of perceived helplessness and emotional health in understanding the relationship among pain, function, and satisfaction following revision knee replacement surgery.
Venkataramanan V; Gignac MA; Dunbar M; Garbuz D; Gollish J; Gross A; Hedden D; MacDonald SJ; Mahomed NN; Schemitsch E; Davis AM
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2013 Jul; 21(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 23603376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Increasing comorbidity is associated with worsening physical function and pain after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Hilton ME; Gioe T; Noorbaloochi S; Singh JA
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Oct; 17(1):421. PubMed ID: 27717340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validation of a short form of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function subscale in hip and knee osteoarthritis.
Baron G; Tubach F; Ravaud P; Logeart I; Dougados M
Arthritis Rheum; 2007 May; 57(4):633-8. PubMed ID: 17471534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Results of total joint arthroplasty and joint preserving surgery in younger patients evaluated by alternative outcome measures.
Klit J
Dan Med J; 2014 Apr; 61(4):B4836. PubMed ID: 24814600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Development of an Encompassing Questionnaire for Evaluating the Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Thomas M; Gwam CU; Jauregui JJ; Elmallah RK; Roche M; Delanois RE
Surg Technol Int; 2017 Jan; 30():306-313. PubMed ID: 28072902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of pain after total knee arthroplasty on the contralateral, nonreplaced knee.
Smith HK; Wylde V; Lingard EA; Blom A; Metcalfe C; Ben-Shlomo Y
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Feb; 95(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 23426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation of the Spanish version of the WOMAC questionnaire for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.
Escobar A; Quintana JM; Bilbao A; Azkárate J; Güenaga JI
Clin Rheumatol; 2002 Nov; 21(6):466-71. PubMed ID: 12447629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Unsatisfactory outcome of arthrodesis performed after septic failure of revision total knee arthroplasty.
Röhner E; Windisch C; Nuetzmann K; Rau M; Arnhold M; Matziolis G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(4):298-301. PubMed ID: 25695981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(22):2017-24. PubMed ID: 23052635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The association between body mass index and the outcomes of total knee arthroplasty.
Baker P; Petheram T; Jameson S; Reed M; Gregg P; Deehan D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Aug; 94(16):1501-8. PubMed ID: 22992819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Validity and Responsiveness of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score: A Comparative Study Among Total Knee Replacement Patients.
Gandek B; Ware JE
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2017 Jun; 69(6):817-825. PubMed ID: 28085998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the EuroQol and short form 6D in Singapore multiethnic Asian knee osteoarthritis patients scheduled for total knee replacement.
Xie F; Li SC; Luo N; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Fong KY; Thumboo J
Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Aug; 57(6):1043-9. PubMed ID: 17665466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patient's personality predicts recovery after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study.
Gong L; Dong JY
J Orthop Sci; 2014 Mar; 19(2):263-269. PubMed ID: 24379015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia.
Lingard EA; Sledge CB; Learmonth ID;
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Jun; 88(6):1201-7. PubMed ID: 16757751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pitfalls of using patient recall to derive preoperative status in outcome studies of total knee arthroplasty.
Lingard EA; Wright EA; Sledge CB;
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Aug; 83(8):1149-56. PubMed ID: 11507122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Technical aspects of revision and functional outcome after revision of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Somford MP; Brouwer RW; Haen PW; van Raay JJ; van Raaij TM
Knee; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1020-1023. PubMed ID: 27624394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of validity, and responsiveness between general and disease-specific quality of life instruments (Thai version) in knee osteoarthritis.
Tangtrakulwanich B; Wiwatwongwana S; Chongsuvivatwong V; Geater AF
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Sep; 89(9):1454-9. PubMed ID: 17100384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An Overview and Predictors of Achieving the Postoperative Ceiling Effect of the WOMAC Score Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Clement ND; Weir D; Holland JP; Gerrand CH; Deehan DJ
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Feb; 34(2):273-280. PubMed ID: 30391050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
