435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20962701)
1. In vivo measurements of the insertion depth of cochlear implant arrays using flat-panel volume computed tomography.
Trieger A; Schulze A; Schneider M; Zahnert T; Mürbe D
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jan; 32(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 20962701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Insertion depth angles of cochlear implant arrays with varying length: a temporal bone study.
Franke-Trieger A; Jolly C; Darbinjan A; Zahnert T; Mürbe D
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jan; 35(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 24335932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of insertion depth angle based on cochlea diameter and linear insertion depth: a prediction tool for the CI422.
Franke-Trieger A; Mürbe D
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3193-9. PubMed ID: 25361895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cone beam CT for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation Cochlear implantation - a human cadaveric study.
Nateghifard K; Low D; Awofala L; Srikanthan D; Kuthubutheen J; Daly M; Chan H; Irish J; Chen J; Lin V; Le TN
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(1):65. PubMed ID: 31753027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cochlear implants: Insertion assessment by computed tomography.
Menegatti Pavan AL; Alves AFF; Giacomini G; Altemani JMC; Castilho AM; Lauria RA; da Silva VAR; Guimarães AC; de Pina DR
Am J Otolaryngol; 2018; 39(4):431-435. PubMed ID: 29685378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postoperative radiographic assessment of the Combi 40 cochlear implant.
Czerny C; Steiner E; Gstoettner W; Baumgartner WD; Imhof H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Dec; 169(6):1689-94. PubMed ID: 9393191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of Cochlear Implant Electrode Position From Intraoperative Post-insertion Skull Radiographs: A Validation Study.
Svrakic M; Friedmann DR; Berman PM; Davis AJ; Roland JT; Svirsky MA
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(9):1486-91. PubMed ID: 26375970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imaging cochlear implantation with round window insertion in human temporal bones and cochlear morphological variation using high-resolution cone beam CT.
Zou J; Lähelmä J; Koivisto J; Dhanasingh A; Jolly C; Aarnisalo A; Wolff J; Pyykkö I
Acta Otolaryngol; 2015 May; 135(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 25675836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical investigation of the Nucleus Slim Modiolar Electrode.
Aschendorff A; Briggs R; Brademann G; Helbig S; Hornung J; Lenarz T; Marx M; Ramos A; Stöver T; Escudé B; James CJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(3):169-179. PubMed ID: 29059669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Skull Radiograph and Computed Tomography Measurements of Cochlear Implant Insertion Angles.
Gallant S; Friedmann DR; Hagiwara M; Roland JT; Svirsky MA; Jethanamest D
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e298-e303. PubMed ID: 30741910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The size of the cochlea and predictions of insertion depth angles for cochlear implant electrodes.
Escudé B; James C; Deguine O; Cochard N; Eter E; Fraysse B
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():27-33. PubMed ID: 17063008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Accurate and Individualized Preoperative Estimation Method for the Linear Insertion Depth of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays Based on Computed Tomography.
Jia G; Song Z; Wu L; Sun Q; Sheng Y; Ni Y; Li H; Li W
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1036-1042. PubMed ID: 36864593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cochlear coiling pattern and orientation differences in cochlear implant candidates.
Martinez-Monedero R; Niparko JK; Aygun N
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1086-93. PubMed ID: 21817935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atraumaticity study of 2 cochlear implant electrode arrays.
Manrique M; Picciafuoco S; Manrique R; Sanhueza I; Domínguez P; Pérez N; Zubieta JL; de Abajo J
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):619-28. PubMed ID: 24569795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of insertion depth of cochlear implant electrodes upon speech perception.
Yukawa K; Cohen L; Blamey P; Pyman B; Tungvachirakul V; O'Leary S
Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(3):163-72. PubMed ID: 15084821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A New Slim Modiolar Electrode Array for Cochlear Implantation: A Radiological and Histological Study.
Iso-Mustajärvi M; Matikka H; Risi F; Sipari S; Koski T; Willberg T; Lehtimäki A; Tervaniemi J; Löppönen H; Dietz A
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):e327-e334. PubMed ID: 28796083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cochlear length determination using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in a clinical setting.
Würfel W; Lanfermann H; Lenarz T; Majdani O
Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():65-72. PubMed ID: 25124151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Insertion Depth in Cochlear Implantation and Outcome in Residual Hearing and Vestibular Function.
Nordfalk KF; Rasmussen K; Hopp E; Bunne M; Silvola JT; Jablonski GE
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e129-37. PubMed ID: 26524566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn.
van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; van der Marel KS; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 26891130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of electrode position between round window and cochleostomy inserting approaches among young children: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Fan X; Xia M; Wang Z; Zhang H; Liu C; Wang N; Hou L; Li C; Xu A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Sep; 138(9):815-821. PubMed ID: 29936898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
