217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20962776)
1. Maximizing the clinical utility of comparative effectiveness research.
Umscheid CA
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Dec; 88(6):876-9. PubMed ID: 20962776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An integrated evidence rating to frame comparative effectiveness assessments for decision makers.
Ollendorf DA; Pearson SD
Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S145-52. PubMed ID: 20473206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right.
Sox HC
Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S7-8. PubMed ID: 20473202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative effectiveness research in the United States: a progress report.
Sullivan SD; Carlson JJ; Hansen RN
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 23227997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What do providers, payers and patients need from comparative effectiveness research on diagnostics? The case of HER2/Neu testing in breast cancer.
Trosman JR; Weldon CB; Schink JC; Gradishar WJ; Benson AB
J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Jul; 2(4):461-77. PubMed ID: 24236686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The methods of comparative effectiveness research.
Sox HC; Goodman SN
Annu Rev Public Health; 2012 Apr; 33():425-45. PubMed ID: 22224891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific and organizational collaboration in comparative effectiveness research: the VA cooperative studies program model.
Huang GD; Ferguson RE; Peduzzi PN; O'Leary TJ
Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e24-31. PubMed ID: 21184863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Invited article: comparative effectiveness research, evidence-based medicine, and the AAN.
French JA; England JD
Neurology; 2010 Aug; 75(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 20697109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breaking up is hard to do: why disinvestment in medical technology is harder than investment.
Haas M; Hall J; Viney R; Gallego G
Aust Health Rev; 2012 May; 36(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 22624634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research.
Dreyer NA; Tunis SR; Berger M; Ollendorf D; Mattox P; Gliklich R
Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Oct; 29(10):1818-25. PubMed ID: 20921481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Applying comparative effectiveness research methods in bipolar disorders.
McCombs JS; Ganapathy V; Zolfaghari S
J Affect Disord; 2011 Apr; 130(1-2):145-54. PubMed ID: 20970196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.
Ahmed S; Berzon RA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Moinpour CM; Basch E; Reeve BB; Wu AW;
Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1060-70. PubMed ID: 22922434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative effectiveness research for prostate cancer radiation therapy: current status and future directions.
Shen X; Zaorsky NG; Mishra MV; Foley KA; Hyslop T; Hegarty S; Pizzi LT; Dicker AP; Showalter TN
Future Oncol; 2012 Jan; 8(1):37-54. PubMed ID: 22149034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Leveraging observational registries to inform comparative effectiveness research.
Shah BR; Drozda J; Peterson ED
Am Heart J; 2010 Jul; 160(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20598966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methodological challenges of comparative effectiveness research in pain: implications for investigators, clinicians, and policy makers.
Bellows BK; Biskupiak J
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2011; 25(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 21882980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perioperative comparative effectiveness research.
Memtsoudis SG; Besculides MC
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 25(4):535-47. PubMed ID: 22099919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prioritizing comparative-effectiveness research topics via stakeholder involvement: an application in COPD.
Pickard AS; Lee TA; Solem CT; Joo MJ; Schumock GT; Krishnan JA
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Dec; 90(6):888-92. PubMed ID: 22048220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of comparative effectiveness research in drug coverage and pricing decisions: a six-country comparison.
Sorenson C
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2010 Jul; 91():1-14. PubMed ID: 20614655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Practical guide to understanding Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).
Neely JG; Sharon JD; Graboyes EM; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Grindler DJ; Dassopoulos T;
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):804-12. PubMed ID: 24098005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Overview of best practices in conducting comparative-effectiveness reviews.
Guise JM; Viswanathan M
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Dec; 90(6):876-82. PubMed ID: 22048219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
