These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20962907)
21. Use of a Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron-specific alpha-1-6, mannanase quantitative PCR to detect human faecal pollution in water. Yampara-Iquise H; Zheng G; Jones JE; Carson CA J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 105(5):1686-93. PubMed ID: 19149766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Detection of the human specific Bacteroides genetic marker provides evidence of widespread sewage contamination of stormwater in the urban environment. Sauer EP; Vandewalle JL; Bootsma MJ; McLellan SL Water Res; 2011 Aug; 45(14):4081-91. PubMed ID: 21689838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Performance of forty-one microbial source tracking methods: a twenty-seven lab evaluation study. Boehm AB; Van De Werfhorst LC; Griffith JF; Holden PA; Jay JA; Shanks OC; Wang D; Weisberg SB Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6812-28. PubMed ID: 23880218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of chemical, molecular, and traditional markers of fecal contamination in an effluent dominated urban stream. Litton RM; Ahn JH; Sercu B; Holden PA; Sedlak DL; Grant SB Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Oct; 44(19):7369-75. PubMed ID: 20839837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Detection of spatial fluctuations of non-point source fecal pollution in coral reef surrounding waters in southwestern Puerto Rico using PCR-based assays. Bonkosky M; Hernández-Delgado EA; Sandoz B; Robledo IE; Norat-Ramírez J; Mattei H Mar Pollut Bull; 2009 Jan; 58(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 18952244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Determination of wild animal sources of fecal indicator bacteria by microbial source tracking (MST) influences regulatory decisions. Nguyen KH; Senay C; Young S; Nayak B; Lobos A; Conrad J; Harwood VJ Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():424-434. PubMed ID: 30059905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Detection and quantification of the human-specific HF183 Bacteroides 16S rRNA genetic marker with real-time PCR for assessment of human faecal pollution in freshwater. Seurinck S; Defoirdt T; Verstraete W; Siciliano SD Environ Microbiol; 2005 Feb; 7(2):249-59. PubMed ID: 15658992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Human-Associated Bacteroides spp. and Human Polyomaviruses as Microbial Source Tracking Markers in Hawaii. Kirs M; Caffaro-Filho RA; Wong M; Harwood VJ; Moravcik P; Fujioka RS Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 82(22):6757-6767. PubMed ID: 27613686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of the host-specificity and prevalence of enterococci surface protein (esp) marker in sewage and its application for sourcing human fecal pollution. Ahmed W; Stewart J; Powell D; Gardner T J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(4):1583-8. PubMed ID: 18574191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relationship of human-associated microbial source tracking markers with Enterococci in Gulf of Mexico waters. Gordon KV; Brownell M; Wang SY; Lepo JE; Mott J; Nathaniel R; Kilgen M; Hellein KN; Kennedy E; Harwood VJ Water Res; 2013 Mar; 47(3):996-1004. PubMed ID: 23260177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Human-Associated Lachnospiraceae Genetic Markers Improve Detection of Fecal Pollution Sources in Urban Waters. Feng S; Bootsma M; McLellan SL Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Jul; 84(14):. PubMed ID: 29728386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Distribution and Differential Survival of Traditional and Alternative Indicators of Fecal Pollution at Freshwater Beaches. Cloutier DD; McLellan SL Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 83(4):. PubMed ID: 27940538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Application of mussels as biosamplers for characterization of faecal pollution in coastal recreational waters. Roslev P; Bukh AS; Iversen L; Sønderbo H; Iversen N Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(3):586-93. PubMed ID: 20706005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Application of leftover sample material from waterborne protozoa monitoring for the molecular detection of Bacteroidales and fecal source tracking markers. Ryu H; Tran H; Ware MW; Iker B; Griffin S; Egorov A; Edge TA; Newmann N; Villegas EN; Domingo JW J Microbiol Methods; 2011 Sep; 86(3):337-43. PubMed ID: 21693138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of the novel crAssphage marker for sewage pollution tracking in storm drain outfalls in Tampa, Florida. Ahmed W; Lobos A; Senkbeil J; Peraud J; Gallard J; Harwood VJ Water Res; 2018 Mar; 131():142-150. PubMed ID: 29281808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sourcing faecal pollution: a combination of library-dependent and library-independent methods to identify human faecal pollution in non-sewered catchments. Ahmed W; Stewart J; Gardner T; Powell D; Brooks P; Sullivan D; Tindale N Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3771-9. PubMed ID: 17482658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Correlation between bacterial indicators and bacteriophages in sewage and sludge. Mandilara GD; Smeti EM; Mavridou AT; Lambiri MP; Vatopoulos AC; Rigas FP FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2006 Oct; 263(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 16958859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An optimized enumeration method for sorbitol-fermenting Bifidobacteria in water samples. Long SC; Arango P C; Plummer JD Can J Microbiol; 2005 May; 51(5):413-22. PubMed ID: 16088337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Concentrations of host-specific and generic fecal markers measured by quantitative PCR in raw sewage and fresh animal feces. Silkie SS; Nelson KL Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4860-71. PubMed ID: 19765792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of Microbial and Chemical Source Tracking Markers To Identify Fecal Contamination Sources in the Humber River (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and Associated Storm Water Outfalls. Staley ZR; Grabuski J; Sverko E; Edge TA Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 82(21):6357-6366. PubMed ID: 27542934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]