These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20963748)

  • 1. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confidence intervals for a random-effects meta-analysis based on Bartlett-type corrections.
    Noma H
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3304-12. PubMed ID: 21964669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects.
    Hardy RJ; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(6):619-29. PubMed ID: 8731004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simple confidence interval for meta-analysis.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3153-9. PubMed ID: 12375296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of statistical methods for meta-analysis.
    Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
    Stat Med; 2001 Mar; 20(6):825-40. PubMed ID: 11252006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple method for inference on an overall effect in meta-analysis.
    Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4531-43. PubMed ID: 17397112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Confidence intervals and P-values for meta-analysis with publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB; Eguchi S
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 17688500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18331152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events.
    Bradburn MJ; Deeks JJ; Berlin JA; Russell Localio A
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):53-77. PubMed ID: 16596572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment-effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter JR; Binder H; Schumacher M
    Biostatistics; 2011 Jan; 12(1):122-42. PubMed ID: 20656692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameter.
    Jackson D
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):2911-21. PubMed ID: 16345059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Random-effects meta-analysis of correlations: Monte Carlo evaluation of mean estimators.
    Hafdahl AR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):227-54. PubMed ID: 19527563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why add anything to nothing? The arcsine difference as a measure of treatment effect in meta-analysis with zero cells.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Olkin I
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):721-38. PubMed ID: 19072749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity.
    Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J; Olkin I
    Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2113-26. PubMed ID: 12820277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transforming the Model T: random effects meta-analysis with stable weights.
    Malloy MJ; Prendergast LA; Staudte RG
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(11):1842-64. PubMed ID: 23097338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bootstrap confidence intervals and bias correction in the estimation of HIV incidence from surveillance data with testing for recent infection.
    Carnegie NB
    Stat Med; 2011 Apr; 30(8):854-65. PubMed ID: 21432879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.