79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20964493)
1. Relationship between the margin of manoeuvre and the return to work after a long-term absence due to a musculoskeletal disorder: an exploratory study.
Durand MJ; Vézina N; Baril R; Loisel P; Richard MC; Ngomo S
Disabil Rehabil; 2011; 33(13-14):1245-52. PubMed ID: 20964493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Work and mental health: learning from return-to-work rehabilitation programs designed for workers with musculoskeletal disorders.
Briand C; Durand MJ; St-Arnaud L; Corbière M
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(4-5):444-57. PubMed ID: 17673291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive factors of sustained return to work for persons with musculoskeletal disorders who participated in rehabilitation.
Lydell M; Grahn B; Månsson J; Baigi A; Marklund B
Work; 2009; 33(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 19759430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Value of functional capacity evaluation information in a clinical setting for predicting return to work.
Streibelt M; Blume C; Thren K; Reneman MF; Mueller-Fahrnow W
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Mar; 90(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 19254607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Self-rated health as a predictor of return to work among employees on long-term sickness absence.
Post M; Krol B; Groothoff JW
Disabil Rehabil; 2006 Mar; 28(5):289-97. PubMed ID: 16492623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does participation in interdisciplinary work rehabilitation programme influence return to work obstacles and predictive factors?
Marois E; Durand MJ
Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(12):994-1007. PubMed ID: 19037769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are performance-based functional assessments superior to semistructured interviews for enhancing return-to-work outcomes?
Gross DP; Asante AK; Miciak M; Battié MC; Carroll LJ; Sun A; Mikalsky M; Huellstrung R; Niemeläinen R
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 May; 95(5):807-815.e1. PubMed ID: 24502839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Musculoskeletal disability, employment, and rehabilitation.
Straaton KV; Maisiak R; Wrigley JM; Fine PR
J Rheumatol; 1995 Mar; 22(3):505-13. PubMed ID: 7783071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the programme impact theory for a work rehabilitation programme.
Durand MJ; Berthelette D; Loisel P; Imbeau D
Work; 2012; 42(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 22523042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Work-related determinants of return to work of employees on long-term sickness absence.
Post M; Krol B; Groothoff JW
Disabil Rehabil; 2005 May; 27(9):481-8. PubMed ID: 16040552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors explaining return to work for long-term sick workers in Norway.
Landstad BJ; Wendelborg C; Hedlund M
Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(15):1215-26. PubMed ID: 19280436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perception differences between groups of employees identifying the factors that influence a return to work after a work-related musculoskeletal injury.
Fisher TF
Work; 2003; 21(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 14600325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thoughts and feelings of future working life as a predictor of return to work: a combined qualitative and quantitative study of sick-listed persons with musculoskeletal disorders.
Lydell M; Hildingh C; Månsson J; Marklund B; Grahn B
Disabil Rehabil; 2011; 33(13-14):1262-71. PubMed ID: 21034307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A study of the effects of isokinetic pre-employment physical capability screening in the reduction of musculoskeletal disorders in a labor intensive work environment.
Rosenblum KE; Shankar A
Work; 2006; 26(2):215-28. PubMed ID: 16477114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An exploration of alternative methods for assessing return-to-work success following occupational injury.
Young AE
Disabil Rehabil; 2014; 36(11):914-24. PubMed ID: 23962195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preventing incapacity in people with musculoskeletal disorders.
Waddell G
Br Med Bull; 2006; 77-78():55-69. PubMed ID: 16968689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [SIMBO: a Screening Instrument for Identification of Work-Related Disabilities--analyses of construct and prognostic validity].
Streibelt M; Gerwinn H; Hansmeier T; Thren K; Müller-Fahrnow W
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2007 Oct; 46(5):266-75. PubMed ID: 17955394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptions of possibilities of returning to work with chronic musculoskeletal disorders.
Svajger A; Winding K
Work; 2009; 32(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 19478415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What works best for whom? An exploratory, subgroup analysis in a randomized, controlled trial on the effectiveness of a workplace intervention in low back pain patients on return to work.
Steenstra IA; Knol DL; Bongers PM; Anema JR; van Mechelen W; de Vet HC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1243-9. PubMed ID: 19412140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Criterion-related validity of functional capacity evaluation lifting tests on future work disability risk and return to work in the construction industry.
Gouttebarge V; Kuijer PP; Wind H; van Duivenbooden C; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
Occup Environ Med; 2009 Oct; 66(10):657-63. PubMed ID: 19468014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
