These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20964757)

  • 1. Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(22):5061-78. PubMed ID: 20964757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis.
    Dakin EE; Avise JC
    Heredity (Edinb); 2004 Nov; 93(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 15292911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The potential costs of accounting for genotypic errors in molecular parentage analyses.
    Morrissey MB; Wilson AJ
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Nov; 14(13):4111-21. PubMed ID: 16262862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing for association with a case-parents design in the presence of genotyping errors.
    Morris RW; Kaplan NL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 14748014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parentage testing in alpacas (Vicugna pacos) using semi-automated fluorescent multiplex PCRs with 10 microsatellite markers.
    Agapito J; Rodríguez J; Herrera-Velit P; Timoteo O; Rojas P; Boettcher PJ; García F; Espinoza JR
    Anim Genet; 2008 Apr; 39(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 18261186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An empirical comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for parentage and kinship assignment in a wild sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) population.
    Hauser L; Baird M; Hilborn R; Seeb LW; Seeb JE
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Mar; 11 Suppl 1():150-61. PubMed ID: 21429171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of the number of genetic markers required for individual animal identification accounting for genotyping errors.
    Weller JI; Seroussi E; Ron M
    Anim Genet; 2006 Aug; 37(4):387-9. PubMed ID: 16879353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tetranucleotide microsatellites contribute to a highly discriminating parentage test panel in pig.
    Cherel P; Glénisson J; Pires J
    Anim Genet; 2011 Dec; 42(6):659-61. PubMed ID: 22035009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do marker-based paternity assignments favour heterozygous and unrelated males?
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 May; 19(9):1898-913. PubMed ID: 20345688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing parent numbers from offspring genotypes: the importance of marker polymorphism.
    Sefc KM; Koblmüller S
    J Hered; 2009; 100(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 18984859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of genotyping error rate from repeat genotyping, unintentional recaptures and known parent-offspring comparisons in 16 microsatellite loci for brown rockfish (Sebastes auriculatus).
    Hess MA; Rhydderch JG; LeClair LL; Buckley RM; Kawase M; Hauser L
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2012 Nov; 12(6):1114-23. PubMed ID: 22958648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unbiased estimation of relative reproductive success of different groups: evaluation and correction of bias caused by parentage assignment errors.
    Araki H; Blouin MS
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Nov; 14(13):4097-109. PubMed ID: 16262861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parentage and sibship exclusions: higher statistical power with more family members.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Aug; 99(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 17487215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using blocks of linked single nucleotide polymorphisms as highly polymorphic genetic markers for parentage analysis.
    Jones B; Walsh D; Werner L; Fiumera A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2009 Mar; 9(2):487-97. PubMed ID: 21564678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Power of microsatellite markers for fingerprinting and parentage analysis in Eucalyptus grandis breeding populations.
    Kirst M; Cordeiro CM; Rezende GD; Grattapaglia D
    J Hered; 2005; 96(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 15601907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness.
    Wang J
    Genet Res; 2007 Jun; 89(3):135-53. PubMed ID: 17894908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of novel SNP system for individual and pedigree control in a Japanese Black cattle population using whole-genome genotyping assay.
    Hara K; Kon Y; Sasazaki S; Mukai F; Mannen H
    Anim Sci J; 2010 Aug; 81(4):506-12. PubMed ID: 20662822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single nucleotide polymorphisms for pig identification and parentage exclusion.
    Rohrer GA; Freking BA; Nonneman D
    Anim Genet; 2007 Jun; 38(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 17433014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. APIS: An auto-adaptive parentage inference software that tolerates missing parents.
    Griot R; Allal F; Brard-Fudulea S; Morvezen R; Haffray P; Phocas F; Vandeputte M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Mar; 20(2):579-590. PubMed ID: 31609085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.