These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20965675)

  • 41. Cone beam computed tomography devices in the evaluation of buccal bone in anterior teeth.
    Dantas LL; Ferreira PP; Oliveira L; Neves FS; Campos P; Scarfe WC; Crusoe-Rebello I
    Aust Dent J; 2019 Jun; 64(2):161-166. PubMed ID: 30839124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Assessment of CBCT gray value in different regions-of-interest and fields-of-view compared to Hounsfield unit.
    Yadegari A; Safi Y; Shahbazi S; Yaghoutiazar S; Ghazizadeh Ahsaie M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230187. PubMed ID: 37874074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Segmentation of Trabecular Jaw Bone on Cone Beam CT Datasets.
    Nackaerts O; Depypere M; Zhang G; Vandenberghe B; Maes F; Jacobs R;
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1082-91. PubMed ID: 24629139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Image quality optimization using a narrow vertical detector dental cone-beam CT.
    Brasil DM; Pauwels R; Coucke W; Haiter-Neto F; Jacobs R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Mar; 48(3):20180357. PubMed ID: 30604636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study.
    Fuster-Torres MÁ; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1051-6. PubMed ID: 22010089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Radiologic techniques using CBCT and 3-D treatment planning for implant placement.
    Peck JN; Conte GJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Apr; 36(4):287-90, 292-4, 296-7. PubMed ID: 18481625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of 6 cone-beam computed tomography systems for image quality and detection of simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Nackaerts O; ; Willems G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e129-39. PubMed ID: 21889061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effective doses of dental cone beam computed tomography: effect of 360-degree versus 180-degree rotation angles.
    Mutalik S; Tadinada A; Molina MR; Sinisterra A; Lurie A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Oct; 130(4):433-446. PubMed ID: 32616450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications.
    Loubele M; Bogaerts R; Van Dijck E; Pauwels R; Vanheusden S; Suetens P; Marchal G; Sanderink G; Jacobs R
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):461-8. PubMed ID: 18639404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Image quality of two different mobile cone beam computed tomographs for maxillofacial surgery.
    Seeberger R; Buchgeister M; Seethaler AC; Shiozawa T; Hoffmann J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):731-4. PubMed ID: 22361302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Analysis of image quality and dose calculation accuracy in cone beam CT acquisitions with limited projection data (half scan, half fan) with regard to usability for adaptive radiation therapy treatment planning].
    Kowatsch M; Winkler P; Zurl B; Konrad T; Schröttner J
    Z Med Phys; 2011; 21(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 20888201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Dose measurements for dental cone-beam CT: a comparison with MSCT and panoramic imaging.
    Deman P; Atwal P; Duzenli C; Thakur Y; Ford NL
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 59(12):3201-22. PubMed ID: 24862349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Influence of cone beam CT scanning parameters on grey value measurements at an implant site.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; Motroni A; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(3):79884780. PubMed ID: 22933535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Monte Carlo modeling for dose assessment in cone beam CT for oral and maxillofacial applications.
    Zhang G; Marshall N; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):072103. PubMed ID: 23822447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning.
    Chan HL; Misch K; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2010 Aug; 19(4):288-98. PubMed ID: 20683285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template.
    Vercruyssen M; Cox C; Coucke W; Naert I; Jacobs R; Quirynen M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology].
    Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
    Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Optimization of exposure parameters in dental cone beam computed tomography using a 3-step approach.
    Panmekiate S; Rungwittayathon P; Suptaweeponboon W; Tangtraitham N; Pauwels R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Dec; 126(6):545-552. PubMed ID: 30237039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.