These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20966319)
1. Oral contrast media for body CT: Comparison of diatrizoate sodium and iohexol for patient acceptance and bowel opacification. McNamara MM; Lockhart ME; Fineberg NS; Berland LL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1137-41. PubMed ID: 20966319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography. Peterson CM; Lin M; Pilgram T; Heiken JP J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21412090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Oral administration of intravenous contrast media: a tasty alternative to conventional oral contrast media in computed tomography]. Diederichs G; Franiel T; Asbach P; Romano V; Hamm B; Rogalla P Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 17786895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. A double-blind randomized study comparing an aqueous solution of amidotrizoate, an aqueous solution of iohexol and a viscous solution of iohexol. Lönnemark M; Magnusson A; Ahlström H Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 8369192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abdominal and pelvic CT: use of oral metoclopramide to enhance bowel opacification. Thoeni RF; Filson RG Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):391-3. PubMed ID: 3174985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen. Koo CW; Shah-Patel LR; Baer JW; Frager DH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1307-13. PubMed ID: 18430848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations. Bernardino ME; Fishman EK; Jeffrey RB; Brown PC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Iohexol for contrast enhancement of bowel in pediatric abdominal CT. Smevik B; Westvik J Acta Radiol; 1990 Nov; 31(6):601-4. PubMed ID: 2278786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. Iohexol of different concentrations as a gastrointestinal contrast medium. Lönnemark M; Magnusson A Acta Radiol; 1995 Jul; 36(4):396-8. PubMed ID: 7619619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Water-soluble contrast media in obstructed in ischemic small intestine. A clinical and experimental study. Stordahl A J Oslo City Hosp; 1989; 39(1-2):3-22. PubMed ID: 2649649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of dilute barium and dilute water-soluble contrast in opacification of the bowel for abdominal computed tomography. Chambers SE; Best JJ Clin Radiol; 1984 Nov; 35(6):463-4. PubMed ID: 6499385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of low-density neutral oral contrast material in PET/CT for tumor imaging: results of a randomized clinical trial. Otero HJ; Yap JT; Patak MA; Erturk SM; Israel DA; Johnston CJ; Sakellis C; Rybicki FJ; Van den Abbeele AD; Ros PR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 19620427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oral contrast agents for CT of abdominal trauma in pediatric patients: a comparison of dilute hypaque and water. Halsted MJ; Racadio JM; Emery KH; Kreymerman P; Poe SA; Bean JA; Donnelly LF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jun; 182(6):1555-9. PubMed ID: 15150008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Telebrix: a better-tasting oral contrast agent for abdominal computed tomography. Bach DB Can Assoc Radiol J; 1991 Apr; 42(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 2039963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of "Gastromiro" for bowel opacification during computed tomography: comparison with diatrizoate and barium sulphate. Doyle GJ; O'Donnell SC; McDonald JR; Murthy LN; Keir MJ; Wright AR Br J Radiol; 1993 Aug; 66(788):681-4. PubMed ID: 7719680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT method for visualization of the appendix using a fixed oral dosage of diatrizoate--clinical experience in 525 cases. Giuliano V; Giuliano C; Pinto F; Scaglione M Emerg Radiol; 2005 Jul; 11(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 16133622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bowel opacification for abdominal computed tomography in children: a clinical trial of oral Telebrix 38. Tannous WN; Azouz EM Can Assoc Radiol J; 1991 Apr; 42(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 2039951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of dilute Calogen as a fat density oral contrast medium in upper abdominal computed tomography, compared with the use of water and positive oral contrast media. Ramsay DW; Markham DH; Morgan B; Rodgers PM; Liddicoat AJ Clin Radiol; 2001 Aug; 56(8):670-3. PubMed ID: 11467870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of an experimental low-attenuation gastrointestinal contrast agent for CT imaging of intestinal ischemia in an animal model. Spilde JM; Lee FT; Chosy SG; Krupinski EA; Kuhlman JE; Yandow DR Acad Radiol; 1999 Feb; 6(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 12680431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of iodixanol with iohexol for delayed pelvic venous opacification: a preliminary study of potential use for CT venography. Michel SJ; Fried AM; Sinha S; Willson J; Bensadoun E; Arnold S; Buck JL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jul; 183(1):123-6. PubMed ID: 15208125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]