248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20966340)
1. Features of prospectively overlooked computer-aided detection marks on prior screening digital mammograms in women with breast cancer.
Cho N; Kim SJ; Choi HY; Lyou CY; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1276-82. PubMed ID: 20966340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: false-positive marks and their reproducibility in negative mammograms.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Seong MH; Cho N; Chang JM
Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):999-1004. PubMed ID: 19863409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of computer-aided detection marks in digital mammography.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 17554186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography.
Warren Burhenne LJ; Wood SA; D'Orsi CJ; Feig SA; Kopans DB; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Tabar L; Vyborny CJ; Castellino RA
Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):554-62. PubMed ID: 10796939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided detection system performance on current and previous digital mammograms in patients with contralateral metachronous breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 22403080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Hofvind S; Jahr G; Castellino RA
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 22287148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology.
Brem RF; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Hoffmeister JW; Desimio MP
Cancer; 2005 Sep; 104(5):931-5. PubMed ID: 16047331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system.
Malich A; Sauner D; Marx C; Facius M; Boehm T; Pfleiderer SO; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):851-6. PubMed ID: 12869683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided detection in screening mammography: variability in cues.
Baker JA; Lo JY; Delong DM; Floyd CE
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):411-7. PubMed ID: 15358850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two software versions of a commercially available computer-aided detection (CAD) system for detecting breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Kim SY; Chang JM; Kim SM; Cho N
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jun; 51(5):482-90. PubMed ID: 20429765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CAD May Not be Necessary for Microcalcifications in the Digital era, CAD May Benefit Radiologists for Masses.
Destounis SV; Arieno AL; Morgan RC
J Clin Imaging Sci; 2012; 2():45. PubMed ID: 22919559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.
James JJ; Gilbert FJ; Wallis MG; Gillan MG; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Agbaje OF; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW
Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
