BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20966387)

  • 1. The effects of age and infant hearing status on maternal use of prosodic cues for clause boundaries in speech.
    Kondaurova MV; Bergeson TR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):740-54. PubMed ID: 20966387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of deafness on acoustic characteristics of American English tense/lax vowels in maternal speech to infants.
    Kondaurova MV; Bergeson TR; Dilley LC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1039-49. PubMed ID: 22894224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of acoustic cues by children with cochlear implants.
    Giezen MR; Escudero P; Baker A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1440-57. PubMed ID: 20689031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intonation and communicative intent in mothers' speech to infants: is the melody the message?
    Fernald A
    Child Dev; 1989 Dec; 60(6):1497-510. PubMed ID: 2612255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maternal interactions with a hearing and hearing-impaired twin: similarities and differences in speech input, interaction quality, and word production.
    Lam C; Kitamura C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 53(3):543-55. PubMed ID: 20220028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The prelexical development in children implanted by 16 months compared with normal hearing children.
    Schramm B; Bohnert A; Keilmann A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 73(12):1673-81. PubMed ID: 19775758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic cues to grammatical structure in infant-directed speech: cross-linguistic evidence.
    Fisher C; Tokura H
    Child Dev; 1996 Dec; 67(6):3192-218. PubMed ID: 9071777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pauses and intonational phrasing: ERP studies in 5-month-old German infants and adults.
    Männel C; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 21(10):1988-2006. PubMed ID: 19296725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Infants' Processing of Prosodic Cues: Electrophysiological Evidence for Boundary Perception beyond Pause Detection.
    Holzgrefe-Lang J; Wellmann C; Höhle B; Wartenburger I
    Lang Speech; 2018 Mar; 61(1):153-169. PubMed ID: 28937300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Children With Cochlear implants recognize their mother's voice.
    Vongpaisal T; Trehub SE; Schellenberg EG; van Lieshout P; Papsin BC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):555-66. PubMed ID: 20588121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of hearing loss on the perception of infant- and adult-directed speech.
    Robertson S; von Hapsburg D; Hay JS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1108-19. PubMed ID: 23798510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory Discrimination of Lexical Stress Patterns in Hearing-Impaired Infants with Cochlear Implants Compared with Normal Hearing: Influence of Acoustic Cues and Listening Experience to the Ambient Language.
    Segal O; Houston D; Kishon-Rabin L
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 26627470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Listening preference for child-directed speech versus nonspeech stimuli in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants after cochlear implantation.
    Segal O; Kishon-Rabin L
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):358-72. PubMed ID: 21512353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age-related changes in prosodic features of maternal speech to prelingually deaf infants with cochlear implants.
    Kondaurova MV; Bergeson TR; Xu H
    Infancy; 2013 Sep; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 24244108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The development of falling intonation in young children with cochlear implants: a 2-year longitudinal study.
    Snow DP; Ertmer DJ
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2013 Jul; 27(6-7):447-58. PubMed ID: 23339514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of vocalization development between normal and congenitally hearing impaired infants during pre-language period].
    Huang LH; Kaga KT; Han DM; Wang T
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 85(11):765-8. PubMed ID: 15949384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustic characteristics of the speech of young cochlear implant users: a comparison with normal-hearing age-mates.
    Uchanski RM; Geers AE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):90S-105S. PubMed ID: 12612484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fricatives, affricates, and vowels in Croatian children with cochlear implants.
    Mildner V; Liker M
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008; 22(10-11):845-56. PubMed ID: 18608242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vowel space characteristics of speech directed to children with and without hearing loss.
    Wieland EA; Burnham EB; Kondaurova M; Bergeson TR; Dilley LC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 58(2):254-67. PubMed ID: 25658071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.