244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2096748)
1. Evaluation of the accuracy of non-invasive automatic blood pressure monitors.
Kawahara M
Anesth Prog; 1990; 37(5):244-7. PubMed ID: 2096748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults.
Chiolero A; Paradis G; Lambert M
Blood Press; 2010 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 20156034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auscultatory versus oscillometric measurement of blood pressure in octogenarians.
Rosholm JU; Arnspang S; Matzen L; Jacobsen IA
Blood Press; 2012 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 22545576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the DINAMAP blood pressure monitor in an ambulatory primary care setting.
Ornstein S; Markert G; Litchfield L; Zemp L
J Fam Pract; 1988 May; 26(5):517-21. PubMed ID: 3367116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-cost oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure monitors: device repeatability and device differences.
Sims AJ; Reay CA; Bousfield DR; Menes JA; Murray A
Physiol Meas; 2005 Aug; 26(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 15886439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement.
Landgraf J; Wishner SH; Kloner RA
Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of blood pressure measurement by the Dinamap monitor in infants and children.
Park MK; Menard SM
Pediatrics; 1987 Jun; 79(6):907-14. PubMed ID: 3588145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices?
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of the Dinamap 1846 XT automated blood pressure monitor.
Beaubien ER; Card CM; Card SE; Biem HJ; Wilson TW
J Hum Hypertens; 2002 Sep; 16(9):647-52. PubMed ID: 12214262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Automatic measurement of blood pressure: limits of oscillometric technique].
Costes Y; Vienot P; Midez P; Christophe JL; Neidhardt A
Agressologie; 1992; 33 Spec No 1():37-45. PubMed ID: 1306941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term variation in blood pressure determines the accuracy of simultaneous and sequential recordings in the validation of blood pressure measuring devices.
Schwan A; Jonsson D
J Hum Hypertens; 1993 Aug; 7(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 8410921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of the measurement of mean arterial blood pressure using automatic oscillometers, arterial cannulation and auscultation.
Rutten AJ; Ilsley AH; Skowronski GA; Runciman WB
Anaesth Intensive Care; 1986 Feb; 14(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 3954015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oscillometric blood pressure measurement used for calibration of the arterial tonometry method contributes significantly to error.
Hansen S; Staber M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Sep; 23(9):781-7. PubMed ID: 16723049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Automatic measure of arterial pressure using the oscillometric method (Dynamap 845)].
Debru JL; Doyon B; Morin B; Mallion JM; Cau G
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1981 Jun; 74 Spec No():125-9. PubMed ID: 6794525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
