These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20967656)

  • 1. Effects of sign characteristics and training methods on safety sign training effectiveness.
    Chan AH; Ng AW
    Ergonomics; 2010 Nov; 53(11):1325-46. PubMed ID: 20967656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of the effectiveness of traffic sign training in terms of training methods and sign characteristics.
    Ng AW; Chan AH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Jun; 12(3):283-95. PubMed ID: 21660896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The guessing of mine safety signs meaning: effects of user factors and cognitive sign features.
    Chan AH; Ng AW
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2012; 18(2):195-208. PubMed ID: 22721538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Warning symbols as reminders of hazards: impact of training.
    Lesch MF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 May; 40(3):1005-12. PubMed ID: 18460368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The guessability of traffic signs: effects of prospective-user factors and sign design features.
    Ng AW; Chan AH
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Nov; 39(6):1245-57. PubMed ID: 17920849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of two training methods for improving warning symbol comprehension.
    Lesch MF
    Appl Ergon; 2008 Mar; 39(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 17900517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of driver factors and sign design features on the comprehensibility of traffic signs.
    Ng AW; Chan AH
    J Safety Res; 2008; 39(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 18571574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age-related differences in warning symbol comprehension and training effectiveness: effects of familiarity, complexity, and comprehensibility.
    Lesch MF; Horrey WJ; Wogalter MS; Powell WR
    Ergonomics; 2011 Oct; 54(10):879-90. PubMed ID: 21973000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Iconic sign comprehension in older adults: the role of cognitive impairment and text enhancement.
    Scialfa C; Spadafora P; Klein M; Lesnik A; Dial L; Heinrich A
    Can J Aging; 2008; 27(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 19158042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comprehension of safety signs for construction workers: comparison of existing and newly designed signs.
    Arphorn S; Augsornpeug N; Srisorrachatr S; Pruktharathikul V
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 2003 Dec; 32(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 16022158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of user factors and symbol referents on public symbol design using the stereotype production method.
    Ng AW; Siu KW; Chan CC
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):230-8. PubMed ID: 21621745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comprehensibility of traffic signs among urban drivers in Turkey.
    Kirmizioglu E; Tuydes-Yaman H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():131-41. PubMed ID: 22269494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of sign design features on bicycle pictorial symbols for bicycling facility signs.
    Oh K; Rogoff A; Smith-Jackson T
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Nov; 44(6):990-5. PubMed ID: 23623234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of color scheme and message lines of variable message signs on driver performance.
    Lai CJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Jul; 42(4):1003-8. PubMed ID: 20441806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ergonomic analysis of safety signs: a focus of informational and cultural ergonomics.
    Cavalcanti J; Soares M
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():3427-32. PubMed ID: 22317242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of the Contributory Factors to the Guessability of Traffic Signs.
    Liu J; Wen H; Zhu D; Kumfer W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 30626149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of learning style and cognitive ability on recall of names and faces in an older population.
    Neils-Strunjas J; Krikorian R; Shidler M; Likoy S
    J Gen Psychol; 2001 Oct; 128(4):433-45. PubMed ID: 11892890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of age on symbol comprehension in central rail hubs in Taiwan.
    Liu YC; Ho CH
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Nov; 43(6):1016-25. PubMed ID: 22424647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning and recall of Worker Protection Standard (WPS) training in vineyard workers.
    Anger WK; Patterson L; Fuchs M; Will LL; Rohlman DS
    J Agromedicine; 2009; 14(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 19657883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of text type, topic familiarity, and stuttering frequency on listener recall, comprehension, and mental effort.
    Panico J; Healey EC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 52(2):534-46. PubMed ID: 19064906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.