123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20968131)
1. Past, present and future of the cervical cancer screening in Latvia.
Viberga I; Engele L; Baili P;
Tumori; 2010; 96(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 20968131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Professionals' role in implementing a cervical cancer screening program.
Viberga I; Engele L; Kojalo U; Santare D
Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat; 2014; 23(4):69-73. PubMed ID: 25527039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical cancer screening in Bulgaria--past and present experience.
Valerianova Z; Panayotova Y; Amati C; Baili P;
Tumori; 2010; 96(4):538-44. PubMed ID: 20968132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical cancer screening in Latvia: a brief history and recent improvements (2009-2011).
Vīberga I; Poljak M
Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat; 2013; 22(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 23674182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of implementing a nationwide cervical cancer screening program on female population coverage by Pap-tests in Estonia.
Veerus P; Arbyn M; Amati C; Paolo B;
Tumori; 2010; 96(4):524-8. PubMed ID: 20968130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Post-reproductive aged women: a lost generation in the cervical cancer screening programme.
Zodzika J; Krumina K; Jermakova I; Kojalo U; Plisko O; Santare D; Rezeberga D; Lazdane G
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2021 Feb; 26(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 33124491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical cancer assessment in Romania under EUROCHIP-2.
Apostol I; Baban A; Nicula F; Suteu O; Coza D; Amati C; Baili P;
Tumori; 2010; 96(4):545-52. PubMed ID: 20968133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Cervical cancer screening: past--present--future].
Breitenecker G
Pathologe; 2009 Dec; 30 Suppl 2():128-35. PubMed ID: 19756616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. General practitioners can increase participation in cervical cancer screening - a model program in Hungary.
Gyulai A; Nagy A; Pataki V; Tonté D; Ádány R; Vokó Z
BMC Fam Pract; 2018 May; 19(1):67. PubMed ID: 29778099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The state of organized cervical screening program in Hungary in 2006].
Kovacs A; Dobrossy L; Budai A; Boncz I; Cornides A
Orv Hetil; 2007 Mar; 148(12):535-40. PubMed ID: 17444018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effect of Cervical Smears Performed by General Practitioners on the Cervical Cancer Screening Rate of their Female Patients: A Claim Database Analysis and Cross-Sectional Survey.
Favre J; Rochoy M; Raginel T; Pelletier M; Messaadi N; Deken-Delannoy V; Duhamel A; Berkhout C
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 Jul; 27(7):933-938. PubMed ID: 29583084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania.
Arbyn M; Antoine J; Valerianova Z; Mägi M; Stengrevics A; Smailyte G; Suteu O; Micheli A
Tumori; 2010; 96(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 20968129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A roadmap for a comprehensive control of cervical cancer in Poland: integration of available solutions into current practice in primary and secondary prevention.
Nowakowski A; Arbyn M; Turkot MH; Wieszczy P; Miłosz K; Kamiński MF; Didkowska J; Bidziński M; Olszewski W; Wielgoś M; Krzakowski M; Kuchar E; Walewski J
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Mar; 29(2):157-164. PubMed ID: 31517672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].
Della Palma P; Moresco L; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. PubMed ID: 23139174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Challenges in starting organised screening programmes for cervical cancer in the new member states of the European Union.
Nicula FA; Anttila A; Neamtiu L; Zakelj MP; Tachezy R; Chil A; Grce M; Kesić V
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Oct; 45(15):2679-84. PubMed ID: 19699083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of general practitioners in the continued success of the National Cervical Screening Program.
Munro A; Pavicic H; Leung Y; Westoby V; Steel N; Semmens J; O'Leary P
Aust Fam Physician; 2014 May; 43(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 24791771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Gynecological screening or cervical screening? Conflicts between clinical and public health viewpoints].
Döbrőssy L; Kovács A; Budai A; Cornides A
Orv Hetil; 2012 Aug; 153(33):1302-13. PubMed ID: 22890177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Participation rate in cervical cancer screening in general practice related to the proximity of gynecology care facilities: A 3 year follow-up cohort study.
Quersin F; Serman F; Favre J; Rochoy M; Descamps A; Gers E; Duhamel A; Collins C; Deken-Delannoy V; Berkhout C; Raginel T
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():955559. PubMed ID: 36324473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical cancer screening in the Czech Republic.
Tachezy R; Rob L
Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():27-9. PubMed ID: 17598501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
