These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20968360)

  • 1. Advantage of bimodal fitting in prosody perception for children using a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Straatman LV; Rietveld AC; Beijen J; Mylanus EA; Mens LH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1884-95. PubMed ID: 20968360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The perception of stress and intonation in children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Hegarty L; Faulkner A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14 Suppl 4():S35-9. PubMed ID: 24533762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The perception of prosody and speaker gender in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Pyschny V; Walger M; von Wedel H
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Jan; 48(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 19173112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Weighting of cues for fricative place of articulation perception by children wearing cochlear implants.
    Hedrick M; Bahng J; von Hapsburg D; Younger MS
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):540-7. PubMed ID: 21604957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech perception benefit for children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears and children with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Mok M; Galvin KL; Dowell RC; McKay CM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 19468210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrasting benefits from contralateral implants and hearing aids in cochlear implant users.
    van Hoesel RJ
    Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 288(1-2):100-13. PubMed ID: 22226928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
    Mens LH
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phonological awareness of Cantonese-speaking pre-school children with cochlear implants.
    Tse WT; So LK
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2012 Feb; 14(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 22257071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intelligibility of interrupted and interleaved speech for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees.
    Gnansia D; Pressnitzer D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 265(1-2):46-53. PubMed ID: 20197084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cantonese Tone Perception for Children Who Use a Hearing Aid and a Cochlear Implant in Opposite Ears.
    Mok M; Holt CM; Lee KYS; Dowell RC; Vogel AP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e359-e368. PubMed ID: 28678079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lexical tone perception ability of profoundly hearing-impaired children: performance of cochlear implant and hearing aid users.
    Lee KY; van Hasselt CA; Tong MC
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1079-87. PubMed ID: 20634774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bimodal listeners are not sensitive to interaural time differences in unmodulated low-frequency stimuli (L).
    Lenssen A; Francart T; Brokx J; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3457-60. PubMed ID: 21682370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Communication abilities of children with aided residual hearing: comparison with cochlear implant users.
    Eisenberg LS; Kirk KI; Martinez AS; Ying EA; Miyamoto RT
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 15148177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bimodal hearing and speech perception with a competing talker.
    Pyschny V; Landwehr M; Hahn M; Walger M; von Wedel H; Meister H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 54(5):1400-15. PubMed ID: 21498577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
    Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.