These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20968368)

  • 1. Stimulus factors influencing spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Marrone N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1965-78. PubMed ID: 20968368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.
    Ihlefeld A; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45296. PubMed ID: 23028914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
    Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial Release From Informational Masking: Evidence From Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy.
    Zhang M; Mary Ying YL; Ihlefeld A
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518817464. PubMed ID: 30558491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task.
    Marrone N; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1146-58. PubMed ID: 18681603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validating a Rapid, Automated Test of Spatial Release From Masking.
    Jakien KM; Kampel SD; Stansell MM; Gallun FJ
    Am J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 26(4):507-518. PubMed ID: 28973106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial Release from Masking Using Clinical Corpora: Sentence Recognition in a Colocated or Spatially Separated Speech Masker.
    King G; Corbin NE; Leibold LJ; Buss E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Apr; 31(4):271-276. PubMed ID: 31589139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of interaural differences on speech intelligibility in complex multi-talker environments.
    Ellinger RL; Jakien KM; Gallun FJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):EL170. PubMed ID: 28253635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of tone-vocoding on spatial release from masking for old, hearing-impaired listeners.
    King A; Hopkins K; Plack CJ; Pontoppidan NH; Bramsløw L; Hietkamp RK; Vatti M; Hafez A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2591. PubMed ID: 28464637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The importance of interaural time differences and level differences in spatial release from masking.
    Glyde H; Buchholz JM; Dillon H; Cameron S; Hickson L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL147-52. PubMed ID: 23927217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Benefits of Increased Sensation Level and Bandwidth for Spatial Release From Masking.
    Jakien KM; Kampel SD; Gordon SY; Gallun FJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):e13-e21. PubMed ID: 27556520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.
    Calandruccio L; Buss E; Bowdrie K
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences and age effects in a dichotic informational masking paradigm.
    Wightman FL; Kistler DJ; O'Bryan A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):270-9. PubMed ID: 20649222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An energetic limit on spatial release from masking.
    Best V; Thompson ER; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Aug; 14(4):603-10. PubMed ID: 23649712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.
    Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2093. PubMed ID: 28372135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Weighting of spatial and spectro-temporal cues for auditory scene analysis by human listeners.
    Bremen P; Middlebrooks JC
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59815. PubMed ID: 23527271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.