These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20968378)

  • 1. Relative contribution of off- and on-frequency spectral components of background noise to the masking of unprocessed and vocoded speech.
    Apoux F; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2075-84. PubMed ID: 20968378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Indications for temporal fine structure contribution to co-modulation masking release.
    Pierzycki RH; Seeber BU
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3614-24. PubMed ID: 21218893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Apoux F; Yoho SE; Youngdahl CL; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2205-12. PubMed ID: 23967950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative contribution of target and masker temporal fine structure to the unmasking of consonants in noise.
    Apoux F; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4044-52. PubMed ID: 22225058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial and temporal disparity in signals and maskers affects signal detection in non-human primates.
    Rocchi F; Dylla ME; Bohlen PA; Ramachandran R
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():1-12. PubMed ID: 27770624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of spectral shifting on speech perception in noise.
    Li T; Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):81-8. PubMed ID: 20868733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulations of cochlear-implant speech perception in modulated and unmodulated noise.
    Ihlefeld A; Deeks JM; Axon PR; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):870-80. PubMed ID: 20707456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative contributions of acoustic temporal fine structure and envelope cues for lexical tone perception in noise.
    Qi B; Mao Y; Liu J; Liu B; Xu L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3022. PubMed ID: 28599529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech.
    Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Nov; 112(5 Pt 1):2086-98. PubMed ID: 12430820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masking of low-frequency signals by high-frequency, high-level narrow bands of noise.
    Patra H; Roup CM; Feth LL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):876-87. PubMed ID: 21361445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
    Nelson DA; Fortune TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Band importance for speech-in-speech recognition in the presence of extended high-frequency cues.
    Ananthanarayana RM; Buss E; Monson BB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Aug; 156(2):1202-1213. PubMed ID: 39158325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of low harmonics on tone identification in natural and vocoded speech.
    Liu C; Azimi B; Tahmina Q; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL378-84. PubMed ID: 23145698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Asynchronous glimpsing of speech: spread of masking and task set-size.
    Ozmeral EJ; Buss E; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1152-64. PubMed ID: 22894234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.