BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20968378)

  • 1. Relative contribution of off- and on-frequency spectral components of background noise to the masking of unprocessed and vocoded speech.
    Apoux F; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2075-84. PubMed ID: 20968378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Indications for temporal fine structure contribution to co-modulation masking release.
    Pierzycki RH; Seeber BU
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3614-24. PubMed ID: 21218893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Apoux F; Yoho SE; Youngdahl CL; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2205-12. PubMed ID: 23967950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative contribution of target and masker temporal fine structure to the unmasking of consonants in noise.
    Apoux F; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4044-52. PubMed ID: 22225058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial and temporal disparity in signals and maskers affects signal detection in non-human primates.
    Rocchi F; Dylla ME; Bohlen PA; Ramachandran R
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():1-12. PubMed ID: 27770624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of spectral shifting on speech perception in noise.
    Li T; Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):81-8. PubMed ID: 20868733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulations of cochlear-implant speech perception in modulated and unmodulated noise.
    Ihlefeld A; Deeks JM; Axon PR; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):870-80. PubMed ID: 20707456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative contributions of acoustic temporal fine structure and envelope cues for lexical tone perception in noise.
    Qi B; Mao Y; Liu J; Liu B; Xu L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3022. PubMed ID: 28599529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech.
    Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Nov; 112(5 Pt 1):2086-98. PubMed ID: 12430820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masking of low-frequency signals by high-frequency, high-level narrow bands of noise.
    Patra H; Roup CM; Feth LL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):876-87. PubMed ID: 21361445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
    Nelson DA; Fortune TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of low harmonics on tone identification in natural and vocoded speech.
    Liu C; Azimi B; Tahmina Q; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL378-84. PubMed ID: 23145698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asynchronous glimpsing of speech: spread of masking and task set-size.
    Ozmeral EJ; Buss E; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1152-64. PubMed ID: 22894234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of a simplified normalized covariance measure based on binary weighting functions for predicting the intelligibility of noise-suppressed speech.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3715-23. PubMed ID: 21218903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.