114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20968383)
1. Relative contribution to speech intelligibility of different envelope modulation rates within the speech dynamic range.
Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2127-37. PubMed ID: 20968383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The dynamic range of useful temporal fine structure cues for speech in the presence of a competing talker.
Stone MA; Moore BC; Füllgrabe C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2162-72. PubMed ID: 21973370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
Jørgensen S; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of high-rate envelope speech cues and their perceptually relevant dynamic range for the hearing impaired.
Stone MA; Anton K; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1141-51. PubMed ID: 22894233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contribution of envelope periodicity to release from speech-on-speech masking.
Christiansen C; MacDonald EN; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2197-204. PubMed ID: 23967949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information.
Hopkins K; Moore BC; Stone MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2150-61. PubMed ID: 20968385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of spectro-temporal modulation changes produced by multi-channel compression on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.
Stone MA; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1063-76. PubMed ID: 18247908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefit of high-rate envelope cues in vocoder processing: effect of number of channels and spectral region.
Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2272-82. PubMed ID: 19062865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise.
Miller SE; Schlauch RS; Watson PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):435-43. PubMed ID: 20649237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.
Moore BC; Füllgrabe C; Stone MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):360-71. PubMed ID: 20649230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of temporal-envelope speech cues in different spectral regions.
Ardoint M; Agus T; Sheft S; Lorenzi C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):EL115-21. PubMed ID: 21877769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of periodic interruptions on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine-structure or envelope cues.
Gilbert G; Bergeras I; Voillery D; Lorenzi C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1336. PubMed ID: 17927396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance for speech intelligibility of random fluctuations in "steady" background noise.
Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Mackinnon RC; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2874-81. PubMed ID: 22087916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of lowpass and highpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine structure or envelope cues.
Ardoint M; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 260(1-2):89-95. PubMed ID: 19963053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of differences in fundamental frequency on across-formant grouping in speech perception.
Summers RJ; Bailey PJ; Roberts B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3667-77. PubMed ID: 21218899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of roving level and spectral range on vowel formant discrimination.
Liu C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL264-70. PubMed ID: 21974502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech perception of noise with binary gains.
Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2303-7. PubMed ID: 19062868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contribution of temporal fine structure information and fundamental frequency separation to intelligibility in a competing-speaker paradigm.
Jackson HM; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2421-30. PubMed ID: 23556607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
