These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20968384)

  • 1. Learning to use an artificial visual cue in speech identification.
    Stephens JD; Holt LL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2138-49. PubMed ID: 20968384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neurophysiological Indices of Audiovisual Speech Processing Reveal a Hierarchy of Multisensory Integration Effects.
    O'Sullivan AE; Crosse MJ; Liberto GMD; de Cheveigné A; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 41(23):4991-5003. PubMed ID: 33824190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning.
    Chandrasekaran B; Sampath PD; Wong PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):456-65. PubMed ID: 20649239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integration of facial and newly learned visual cues in speech perception.
    Massaro D; Cohen MM; Meyer H; Stribling T; Sterling C; Vanderhyden S
    Am J Psychol; 2011; 124(3):341-54. PubMed ID: 21977695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of acoustic fine structure cues on the recognition of auditory-only and audiovisual speech.
    Meister H; Fuersen K; Schreitmueller S; Walger M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3116. PubMed ID: 27369134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contribution of dynamic visual cues to audiovisual speech perception.
    Jaekl P; Pesquita A; Alsius A; Munhall K; Soto-Faraco S
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():402-10. PubMed ID: 26100561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech identification in noise: Contribution of temporal, spectral, and visual speech cues.
    Kim J; Davis C; Groot C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3246-57. PubMed ID: 20000938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
    Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Separability of prosodic phrase boundary and phonemic information.
    Nakai S; Turk AE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):966-76. PubMed ID: 21361453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audiovisual speech perception development at varying levels of perceptual processing.
    Lalonde K; Holt RF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1713. PubMed ID: 27106318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Seeing facial motion affects auditory processing in noise.
    Gilbert JL; Lansing CR; Garnsey SM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Nov; 74(8):1761-81. PubMed ID: 23070884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bimodal audio-visual training enhances auditory adaptation process.
    Kawase T; Sakamoto S; Hori Y; Maki A; Suzuki Y; Kobayashi T
    Neuroreport; 2009 Sep; 20(14):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19629016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audiovisual training is better than auditory-only training for auditory-only speech-in-noise identification.
    Lidestam B; Moradi S; Pettersson R; Ricklefs T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):EL142-7. PubMed ID: 25096138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Infants and Adults Use Visual Cues to Improve Detection and Discrimination of Speech in Noise.
    Lalonde K; Werner LA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3860-3875. PubMed ID: 31618097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual speech information: a help or hindrance in perceptual processing of dysarthric speech.
    Borrie SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1473-80. PubMed ID: 25786958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory and visual cueing of the [+/- rounded] feature of vowels.
    Lisker L; Rossi M
    Lang Speech; 1992; 35 ( Pt 4)():391-417. PubMed ID: 1339920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling the temporal dynamics of distinctive feature landmark detectors for speech recognition.
    Jansen A; Niyogi P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1739-58. PubMed ID: 19045664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development of gaze to a speaking face.
    Irwin J; Brancazio L; Volpe N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3145. PubMed ID: 28599552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speaker age and vowel perception.
    Drager K
    Lang Speech; 2011 Mar; 54(Pt 1):99-121. PubMed ID: 21524014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory spectral integration in the perception of diphthongal vowels.
    Fox RA; Jacewicz E; Chang CY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2070-4. PubMed ID: 20968377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.