These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20968385)

  • 1. The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information.
    Hopkins K; Moore BC; Stone MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2150-61. PubMed ID: 20968385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Apoux F; Yoho SE; Youngdahl CL; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2205-12. PubMed ID: 23967950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Léger AC; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Swaminathan J; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 26233038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
    Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The dynamic range of useful temporal fine structure cues for speech in the presence of a competing talker.
    Stone MA; Moore BC; Füllgrabe C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2162-72. PubMed ID: 21973370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative contributions of acoustic temporal fine structure and envelope cues for lexical tone perception in noise.
    Qi B; Mao Y; Liu J; Liu B; Xu L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3022. PubMed ID: 28599529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.
    Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):489-500. PubMed ID: 21786914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual weighting of individual and concurrent cues for sentence intelligibility: frequency, envelope, and fine structure.
    Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):977-88. PubMed ID: 21361454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative contribution to speech intelligibility of different envelope modulation rates within the speech dynamic range.
    Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2127-37. PubMed ID: 20968383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise.
    Miller SE; Schlauch RS; Watson PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):435-43. PubMed ID: 20649237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency specificity of amplitude envelope patterns in noise-vocoded speech.
    Ueda K; Araki T; Nakajima Y
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():169-181. PubMed ID: 29929750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance for speech intelligibility of random fluctuations in "steady" background noise.
    Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Mackinnon RC; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2874-81. PubMed ID: 22087916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Importance of envelope modulations during consonants and vowels in segmentally interrupted sentences.
    Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1568-76. PubMed ID: 24606291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictions of Speech Chimaera Intelligibility Using Auditory Nerve Mean-Rate and Spike-Timing Neural Cues.
    Wirtzfeld MR; Ibrahim RA; Bruce IC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 18(5):687-710. PubMed ID: 28748487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A correlational method to concurrently measure envelope and temporal fine structure weights: effects of age, cochlear pathology, and spectral shaping.
    Fogerty D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1679-89. PubMed ID: 22978896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distorting temporal fine structure by phase shifting and its effects on speech intelligibility and neural phase locking.
    Xu Y; Chen M; LaFaire P; Tan X; Richter CP
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):13387. PubMed ID: 29042580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.