These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Clinical predictors of human blastocyst formation and pregnancy after extended embryo culture and transfer. Thomas MR; Sparks AE; Ryan GL; Van Voorhis BJ Fertil Steril; 2010 Jul; 94(2):543-8. PubMed ID: 19409548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Intratubal transfer of an embryo or a zygote. (TET or GIFT) Past, present and future? Comparative study of tubal embryo transfer (TET) versus in vitro fertilization]. Priou G; Colleu D; Rio M; Vialard J; Bouchet JL; Arvis P Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Feb; 86(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 2063097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of contaminated endometriotic contents on quality of oocytes. Suwajanakorn S; Pruksananonda K; Sereepapong W; Ahnonkitpanit V; Chompurat D; Boonkasemsanti W; Virutamasen P J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jun; 84 Suppl 1():S371-6. PubMed ID: 11529360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of culture conditions for human in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Mahadevan MM Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1998; 16(3):197-208. PubMed ID: 9742624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A simplified approach to in vitro fertilization. Steinkampf MP; Kretzer PA; McElroy E; Conway-Myers BA J Reprod Med; 1992 Mar; 37(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 1564702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimizing the technique of embryo transfer. Mains L; Van Voorhis BJ Fertil Steril; 2010 Aug; 94(3):785-90. PubMed ID: 20409543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Professional Practice Evaluation: How to improve quality management in procreation centers?]. Cabry-Goubet R; Lourdel E; Brasseur F; Sanguinet P; Demailly P; Devaux A; Copin H; Merviel P Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 Oct; 38(10):581-7. PubMed ID: 20884269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Good results of single embryo transfer after in vitro fertilization. The first follow-up report after the introduction of a new regulatory guideline]. Sundström P; Saldeen P Lakartidningen; 2004 Aug; 101(32-33):2476-8. PubMed ID: 15346620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro veritas. Bazell R New Repub; 1988 Feb; 198(3):11-3. PubMed ID: 16041884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Researchers in Canada call for policy to mandate single-embryo transfer in IVF. Voelker R JAMA; 2011 May; 305(18):1848. PubMed ID: 21558511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Should there be a limit of one single embryo implanted during an IVF cycle? Capitulo KL; Huang Z; Hou X MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2011; 36(3):152-3. PubMed ID: 24736709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the timing of mock embryo transfer affect in vitro fertilization implantation and pregnancy rates? Katariya KO; Bates GW; Robinson RD; Arthur NJ; Propst AM Fertil Steril; 2007 Nov; 88(5):1462-4. PubMed ID: 17362942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The application of quality control system in reproductive medicine center]. Zhang NY; Hu YL Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2006 Apr; 12(4):355-7, 361. PubMed ID: 16683574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) comes to the upstate. Boone WR; Johnson JE; Price TM; Bowers BK; Morris MD; Crane MM; Bates GW J S C Med Assoc; 1994 Aug; 90(8):360-6. PubMed ID: 7934003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical obligation for restricting the number of embryos transferred to women: combating the multiple-birth epidemic from in vitro fertilization. Van Voorhis BJ; Ryan GL Semin Reprod Med; 2010 Jul; 28(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 20683792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]