These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20970176)

  • 1. Can hygroscopic expansion compensate polymerization shrinkage? Part I. Deformation of restored teeth.
    Versluis A; Tantbirojn D; Lee MS; Tu LS; DeLong R
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 20970176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effective Expansion: Balance between Shrinkage and Hygroscopic Expansion.
    Suiter EA; Watson LE; Tantbirojn D; Lou JS; Versluis A
    J Dent Res; 2016 May; 95(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 26912221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatially resolved assessments of composite shrinkage in MOD restorations using a digital-image-correlation technique.
    Chuang SF; Chang CH; Chen TY
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 20951420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner.
    Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23092141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shrinkage stress compensation in composite-restored teeth: relaxation or hygroscopic expansion?
    Meriwether LA; Blen BJ; Benson JH; Hatch RH; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
    Dent Mater; 2013 May; 29(5):573-9. PubMed ID: 23537571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shear bond strength of three different nano-restorative materials to dentin.
    Korkmaz Y; Gurgan S; Firat E; Nathanson D
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 20166411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of a nanofilled resin-based coating on water absorption by teeth restored with glass ionomer.
    Hankins AD; Hatch RH; Benson JH; Blen BJ; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Apr; 145(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 24686970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
    Desai PD; Das UK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tooth deformation patterns in molars after composite restoration.
    Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Pintado MR; DeLong R; Douglas WH
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 15134941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compomer materials and secondary caries formation.
    Hicks J; García-Godoy F; Milano M; Flaitz C
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):231-4. PubMed ID: 11764107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cuspal flexure, depth-of-cure, and bond integrity of bulk-fill composites.
    Do T; Church B; Veríssimo C; Hackmyer SP; Tantbirojn D; Simon JF; Versluis A
    Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(7):468-73. PubMed ID: 25514074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scanning electron microscope analysis of internal adaptation of materials used for pulp protection under composite resin restorations.
    Peliz MI; Duarte S; Dinelli W
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(2):118-28. PubMed ID: 16036128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with posterior filling materials of varying reported volumetric shrinkage values.
    Fleming GJ; Hall DP; Shortall AC; Burke FJ
    J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 15683895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between the amount of linear polymerization shrinkage and cuspal deflection.
    Lee SY; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 16802645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.