BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20970830)

  • 1. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of the transperitoneal versus the retroperitoneal approach.
    Marszalek M; Chromecki T; Al-Ali BM; Meixl H; Madersbacher S; Jeschke K; Pummer K; Zigeuner R
    Urology; 2011 Jan; 77(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 20970830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a comparative study.
    Taue R; Izaki H; Koizumi T; Kishimoto T; Oka N; Fukumori T; Takahashi M; Kanayama HO
    Int J Urol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 19087210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
    Desai MM; Strzempkowski B; Matin SF; Steinberg AP; Ng C; Meraney AM; Kaouk JH; Gill IS
    J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 15592021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.
    Wright JL; Porter JR
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):841-5. PubMed ID: 16093966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: patient selection and perioperative outcomes.
    Ng CS; Gill IS; Ramani AP; Steinberg AP; Spaliviero M; Abreu SC; Kaouk JH; Desai MM
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):846-9. PubMed ID: 16093967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.
    Marszalek M; Meixl H; Polajnar M; Rauchenwald M; Jeschke K; Madersbacher S
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1171-8. PubMed ID: 19232819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a single-center experience of 100 cases.
    Okegawa T; Noda H; Horie S; Nutahara K; Higashihara E
    Int J Urol; 2008 Oct; 15(11):957-60. PubMed ID: 18775034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective study of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for T1 tumors--is transperitoneal, retroperitoneal or hand assisted the best approach?
    Nadler RB; Loeb S; Clemens JQ; Batler RA; Gonzalez CM; Vardi IY
    J Urol; 2006 Apr; 175(4):1230-3; discussion 1234. PubMed ID: 16515966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical experience and outcomes.
    Pyo P; Chen A; Grasso M
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1279-83. PubMed ID: 18707736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robotic assisted partial nephrectomy: one surgeon's initial experience.
    DeLong JM; Shapiro O; Moinzadeh A
    Can J Urol; 2010 Jun; 17(3):5207-12. PubMed ID: 20566016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective, randomized controlled study: transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy.
    Nambirajan T; Jeschke S; Al-Zahrani H; Vrabec G; Leeb K; Janetschek G
    Urology; 2004 Nov; 64(5):919-24. PubMed ID: 15533478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using a new technique.
    Nouralizadeh A; Ziaee SA; Basiri A; Simforoosh N; Abdi H; Mahmoudnejad N; Kashi AH
    Urol J; 2009; 6(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 19711271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for a small renal mass.
    Srinualnad S; Mahawong P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Jun; 90(6):1225-30. PubMed ID: 17624223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: current status.
    Bernardo NO; Gill IS
    Arch Esp Urol; 2002 Sep; 55(7):868-80. PubMed ID: 12380320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison.
    Canes D; Berger A; Aron M; Brandina R; Goldfarb DA; Shoskes D; Desai MM; Gill IS
    Eur Urol; 2010 Jan; 57(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 19664877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ventilatory and hemodynamic changes during retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: a prospective real-time comparison.
    Nadu A; Ekstein P; Szold A; Friedman A; Nakache R; Cohen Y; Matzkin H; Weinbroum AA
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):1013-7. PubMed ID: 16094033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prior abdominal surgery and radiation do not complicate the retroperitoneoscopic approach to the kidney or adrenal gland.
    Viterbo R; Greenberg RE; Al-Saleem T; Uzzo RG
    J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):446-50. PubMed ID: 16006862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single-port laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy.
    Kaouk JH; Goel RK
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1163-9. PubMed ID: 19185415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transperitoneal laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy in patients with cirrhosis: report of three cases.
    Hayn MH; Averch TD; Jackman SV
    Can J Urol; 2009 Aug; 16(4):4770-3. PubMed ID: 19671237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair, bicenter analysis with cost comparison using time-driven activity-based costing.
    Laviana AA; Tan HJ; Hu JC; Weizer AZ; Chang SS; Barocas DA
    Curr Opin Urol; 2018 Mar; 28(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 29278580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.