These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20970830)

  • 1. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of the transperitoneal versus the retroperitoneal approach.
    Marszalek M; Chromecki T; Al-Ali BM; Meixl H; Madersbacher S; Jeschke K; Pummer K; Zigeuner R
    Urology; 2011 Jan; 77(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 20970830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a comparative study.
    Taue R; Izaki H; Koizumi T; Kishimoto T; Oka N; Fukumori T; Takahashi M; Kanayama HO
    Int J Urol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 19087210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
    Desai MM; Strzempkowski B; Matin SF; Steinberg AP; Ng C; Meraney AM; Kaouk JH; Gill IS
    J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 15592021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.
    Wright JL; Porter JR
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):841-5. PubMed ID: 16093966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: patient selection and perioperative outcomes.
    Ng CS; Gill IS; Ramani AP; Steinberg AP; Spaliviero M; Abreu SC; Kaouk JH; Desai MM
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):846-9. PubMed ID: 16093967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.
    Marszalek M; Meixl H; Polajnar M; Rauchenwald M; Jeschke K; Madersbacher S
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1171-8. PubMed ID: 19232819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a single-center experience of 100 cases.
    Okegawa T; Noda H; Horie S; Nutahara K; Higashihara E
    Int J Urol; 2008 Oct; 15(11):957-60. PubMed ID: 18775034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective study of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for T1 tumors--is transperitoneal, retroperitoneal or hand assisted the best approach?
    Nadler RB; Loeb S; Clemens JQ; Batler RA; Gonzalez CM; Vardi IY
    J Urol; 2006 Apr; 175(4):1230-3; discussion 1234. PubMed ID: 16515966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical experience and outcomes.
    Pyo P; Chen A; Grasso M
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1279-83. PubMed ID: 18707736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robotic assisted partial nephrectomy: one surgeon's initial experience.
    DeLong JM; Shapiro O; Moinzadeh A
    Can J Urol; 2010 Jun; 17(3):5207-12. PubMed ID: 20566016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective, randomized controlled study: transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy.
    Nambirajan T; Jeschke S; Al-Zahrani H; Vrabec G; Leeb K; Janetschek G
    Urology; 2004 Nov; 64(5):919-24. PubMed ID: 15533478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using a new technique.
    Nouralizadeh A; Ziaee SA; Basiri A; Simforoosh N; Abdi H; Mahmoudnejad N; Kashi AH
    Urol J; 2009; 6(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 19711271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for a small renal mass.
    Srinualnad S; Mahawong P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Jun; 90(6):1225-30. PubMed ID: 17624223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: current status.
    Bernardo NO; Gill IS
    Arch Esp Urol; 2002 Sep; 55(7):868-80. PubMed ID: 12380320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison.
    Canes D; Berger A; Aron M; Brandina R; Goldfarb DA; Shoskes D; Desai MM; Gill IS
    Eur Urol; 2010 Jan; 57(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 19664877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ventilatory and hemodynamic changes during retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: a prospective real-time comparison.
    Nadu A; Ekstein P; Szold A; Friedman A; Nakache R; Cohen Y; Matzkin H; Weinbroum AA
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):1013-7. PubMed ID: 16094033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prior abdominal surgery and radiation do not complicate the retroperitoneoscopic approach to the kidney or adrenal gland.
    Viterbo R; Greenberg RE; Al-Saleem T; Uzzo RG
    J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):446-50. PubMed ID: 16006862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single-port laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy.
    Kaouk JH; Goel RK
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1163-9. PubMed ID: 19185415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transperitoneal laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy in patients with cirrhosis: report of three cases.
    Hayn MH; Averch TD; Jackman SV
    Can J Urol; 2009 Aug; 16(4):4770-3. PubMed ID: 19671237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair, bicenter analysis with cost comparison using time-driven activity-based costing.
    Laviana AA; Tan HJ; Hu JC; Weizer AZ; Chang SS; Barocas DA
    Curr Opin Urol; 2018 Mar; 28(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 29278580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.