These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20970856)

  • 1. Ten steps to making evaluation matter.
    Sridharan S; Nakaima A
    Eval Program Plann; 2011 May; 34(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 20970856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a planning and evaluation methodology for assessing the contribution of theory to a diabetes prevention lifestyle intervention.
    Helitzer D; Peterson AB; Thompson J; Fluder S
    Health Promot Pract; 2008 Oct; 9(4):404-14. PubMed ID: 16861598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Steps towards incorporating heterogeneities into program theory: A case study of a data-driven approach.
    Sridharan S; Jones B; Caudill B; Nakaima A
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Oct; 58():88-97. PubMed ID: 27344483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developing a managed clinical network in palliative care: a realistic evaluation.
    Tolson D; McIntosh J; Loftus L; Cormie P
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Feb; 44(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 16423354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dialogue boxes: a tool for collaborative process evaluation.
    Roe K; Roe K
    Health Promot Pract; 2004 Apr; 5(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 15090168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluations of health promotion: combining realism with rigour.
    Owen N; Magnus P
    Aust Health Rev; 1990; 13(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 10109120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guidelines and criteria for the implementation of community-based health promotion programs for individuals with disabilities.
    Drum CE; Peterson JJ; Culley C; Krahn G; Heller T; Kimpton T; McCubbin J; Rimmer J; Seekins T; Suzuki R; White GW
    Am J Health Promot; 2009; 24(2):93-101, ii. PubMed ID: 19928482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple intervention research programs in community health.
    Edwards N; Mill J; Kothari AR
    Can J Nurs Res; 2004 Mar; 36(1):40-54. PubMed ID: 15133918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The environmental assessment instrument: harnessing the environment for programmatic success.
    Lavinghouze SR; Price AW; Parsons B
    Health Promot Pract; 2009 Apr; 10(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 19372279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The potential contribution of realistic evaluation to small-scale community interventions.
    Lhussier M; Carr SM; Robson A
    Community Pract; 2008 Sep; 81(9):25-8. PubMed ID: 18834025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developing a cross-site evaluation tool for diverse health interventions.
    Kruger DJ; Morrel-Samuels S; Davis-Satterla L; Harris-Ellis BJ; Slonim A
    Health Promot Pract; 2010 Jul; 11(4):555-61. PubMed ID: 19116423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strategies for implementing health promotion programs in multiple American Indian communities.
    Edgerly CC; Laing SS; Day AV; Blackinton PM; Pingatore NL; Haverkate RT; Heany JF
    Health Promot Pract; 2009 Apr; 10(2 Suppl):109S-117S. PubMed ID: 19454757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Challenges and strategies in applying performance measurement to federal public health programs.
    DeGroff A; Schooley M; Chapel T; Poister TH
    Eval Program Plann; 2010 Nov; 33(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 20303176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A collaborative approach to program evaluation of community-based teen pregnancy prevention projects.
    Fluhr JD; Oman RF; Allen JR; Lanphier MG; McLeroy KR
    Health Promot Pract; 2004 Apr; 5(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 15090167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of health promotion programmes].
    Berkowska M; Sito A
    Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2000; 4(4 Suppl 1):27-41. PubMed ID: 11490057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beyond process and outcome evaluation: a comprehensive approach for evaluating health promotion programmes.
    Potvin L; Haddad S; Frohlich KL
    WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):45-62. PubMed ID: 11729783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Measuring the effectiveness of health promotion policy: what can be learnt from Australian success stories?].
    Moodie R
    Promot Educ; 2004; Spec no 1():28-32, 49. PubMed ID: 15551692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing local capacity for health intervention.
    Alfonso ML; Nickelson J; Hogeboom DL; French J; Bryant CA; McDermott RJ; Baldwin JA
    Eval Program Plann; 2008 May; 31(2):145-59. PubMed ID: 18308396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effective strategies for implementation and evaluation of public e-health innovations.
    Lorenzi NM; Unertl KM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 172():45-53. PubMed ID: 22910501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using a logic model to relate the strategic to the tactical in program planning and evaluation: an illustration based on social norms interventions.
    Keller A; Bauerle JA
    Am J Health Promot; 2009; 24(2):89-92, ii. PubMed ID: 19928481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.