These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20971546)

  • 1. Adaptive management on the central Platte River--science, engineering, and decision analysis to assist in the recovery of four species.
    Smith CB
    J Environ Manage; 2011 May; 92(5):1414-9. PubMed ID: 20971546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of opportunistic sightings and expert knowledge to predict and compare Whooping Crane stopover habitat.
    Hefley TJ; Baasch DM; Tyre AJ; Blankenship EE
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1337-46. PubMed ID: 25926004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conservation opportunities for securing in-stream flows in the Platte River Basin: a case study drawing on Casper, Wyoming's municipal water strategy.
    Waller A; Mcleod D; Taylor D
    Environ Manage; 2004 Nov; 34(5):620-33. PubMed ID: 15696304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Informing river management policies and programs with science.
    Edgar B; Schofield N; Campbell A
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(9):185-95. PubMed ID: 11419127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Whooping crane use of riverine stopover sites.
    Baasch DM; Farrell PD; Howlin S; Pearse AT; Farnsworth JM; Smith CB
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209612. PubMed ID: 30625185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive management in the U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System: science-management partnerships for conservation delivery.
    Moore CT; Lonsdorf EV; Knutson MG; Laskowski HP; Lor SK
    J Environ Manage; 2011 May; 92(5):1395-402. PubMed ID: 21109341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conceptual design of monitoring and evaluation plans for fish and wildlife in the Columbia River ecosystem.
    Bisbal GA
    Environ Manage; 2001 Oct; 28(4):433-53. PubMed ID: 11494064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When experts disagree (and better science won't help much): using structured deliberations to support endangered species recovery planning.
    Gregory R; Long G; Colligan M; Geiger JG; Laser M
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Aug; 105():30-43. PubMed ID: 22516871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive management of natural resources--framework and issues.
    Williams BK
    J Environ Manage; 2011 May; 92(5):1346-53. PubMed ID: 21075505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sharing the earth: case studies on population, wildlife, and the environment.
    Waak-strom P
    George Wright Forum; 1994; 11(3):18-24. PubMed ID: 12290864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A long-term, multitrophic level study to assess pulp and paper mill effluent effects on aquatic communities in four US receiving waters: lessons learned.
    Hall TJ; Fisher RP; Rodgers JH; Minshall GW; Landis WG; Kovacs T; Firth BK; Dubé MG; Flinders CA; Deardorff TL; Borton DL
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Apr; 5(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 19115805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Climate extremes and adaptive management on the Colorado River: lessons from the 1997-1998 ENSO event.
    Pulwarty RS; Melis TS
    J Environ Manage; 2001 Nov; 63(3):307-24. PubMed ID: 11775502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The route to best science in implementation of the Endangered Species Act's consultation mandate: the benefits of structured effects analysis.
    Murphy DD; Weiland PS
    Environ Manage; 2011 Feb; 47(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 21161526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overview and quantification of the factors affecting the upstream and downstream movements of Gammarus pulex (Amphipoda).
    Dedecker AP; Goethals PL; De Pauw N
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2003; 68(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 14696234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On valuing information in adaptive-management models.
    Moore AL; McCarthy MA
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):984-93. PubMed ID: 20136870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive management of large aquatic ecosystem recovery programs in the United States.
    Thom R; St Clair T; Burns R; Anderson M
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 2):424-430. PubMed ID: 27545987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decision-making triggers in adaptive management.
    Nie MA; Schultz CA
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Dec; 26(6):1137-44. PubMed ID: 22891956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of river ecosystem models for Flemish watercourses: case studies in the Zwalm river basin.
    Goethals P; Dedecker A; Raes N; Adriaenssens V; Gabriels W; De Pauw N
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(1):71-86. PubMed ID: 15952431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving our legacy: incorporation of adaptive management into state wildlife action plans.
    Fontaine JJ
    J Environ Manage; 2011 May; 92(5):1403-8. PubMed ID: 20971548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating areas of high conservation value in Western Oregon with a decision-support model.
    Staus NL; Strittholt JR; Dellasala DA
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Jun; 24(3):711-20. PubMed ID: 20184658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.