These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20971564)

  • 1. On-line 'automatic pilot' training for hand and arm motor rehabilitation after stroke.
    Zeng J; Sun Y; Jiang L
    Med Hypotheses; 2011 Feb; 76(2):197-8. PubMed ID: 20971564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of robot-aided bilateral force-induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke.
    Chang JJ; Tung WL; Wu WL; Huang MH; Su FC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Oct; 88(10):1332-8. PubMed ID: 17908578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robot-assisted rehabilitation of the paretic upper limb: rationale of the ARAMIS project.
    Dolce G; Lucca LF; Pignolo L
    J Rehabil Med; 2009 Nov; 41(12):1007-101. PubMed ID: 19841833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
    Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A robotic workstation for stroke rehabilitation of the upper extremity using FES.
    Freeman CT; Hughes AM; Burridge JH; Chappell PH; Lewin PL; Rogers E
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Apr; 31(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 18640865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A review of technological and clinical aspects of robot-aided rehabilitation of upper-extremity after stroke.
    Babaiasl M; Mahdioun SH; Jaryani P; Yazdani M
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 25600057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [ARMOR: an electromechanical robot for upper limb training following stroke. A prospective randomised controlled pilot study].
    Mayr A; Kofler M; Saltuari L
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2008 Feb; 40(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 18322901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotics in neuro-rehabilitation.
    Pignolo L
    J Rehabil Med; 2009 Nov; 41(12):955-60. PubMed ID: 19841823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robot therapy for functional recovery of the upper limbs: a pilot study on patients after stroke.
    Bovolenta F; Goldoni M; Clerici P; Agosti M; Franceschini M
    J Rehabil Med; 2009 Nov; 41(12):971-5. PubMed ID: 19841826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The ARAMIS project: a concept robot and technical design.
    Colizzi L; Lidonnici A; Pignolo L
    J Rehabil Med; 2009 Nov; 41(12):1011-101. PubMed ID: 19841834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feasibility of iterative learning control mediated by functional electrical stimulation for reaching after stroke.
    Hughes AM; Freeman CT; Burridge JH; Chappell PH; Lewin PL; Rogers E
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009; 23(6):559-68. PubMed ID: 19190087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Training of reaching in stroke survivors with severe and chronic upper limb paresis using a novel nonrobotic device: a randomized clinical trial.
    Barker RN; Brauer SG; Carson RG
    Stroke; 2008 Jun; 39(6):1800-7. PubMed ID: 18403742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Upper limb rehabilitation robotics after stroke: a perspective from the University of Padua, Italy.
    Masiero S; Carraro E; Ferraro C; Gallina P; Rossi A; Rosati G
    J Rehabil Med; 2009 Nov; 41(12):981-5. PubMed ID: 19841828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation with Other Therapeutic Approaches after Stroke: Current Status, Rationale, and Challenges.
    Mazzoleni S; Duret C; Grosmaire AG; Battini E
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():8905637. PubMed ID: 29057269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic assessment of upper limb motor function after stroke.
    Balasubramanian S; Colombo R; Sterpi I; Sanguineti V; Burdet E
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 91(11 Suppl 3):S255-69. PubMed ID: 23080041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review.
    Oujamaa L; Relave I; Froger J; Mottet D; Pelissier JY
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2009 Apr; 52(3):269-93. PubMed ID: 19398398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients.
    Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 16200755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive-Motor Interference on Upper Extremity Motor Performance in a Robot-Assisted Planar Reaching Task Among Patients With Stroke.
    Shin JH; Park G; Cho DY
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 Apr; 98(4):730-737. PubMed ID: 28049003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intramuscular electrical stimulation for upper limb recovery in chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory randomized clinical trial.
    Chae J; Harley MY; Hisel TZ; Corrigan CM; Demchak JA; Wong YT; Fang ZP
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009; 23(6):569-78. PubMed ID: 19155351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computerized arm training improves the motor control of the severely affected arm after stroke: a single-blinded randomized trial in two centers.
    Hesse S; Werner C; Pohl M; Rueckriem S; Mehrholz J; Lingnau ML
    Stroke; 2005 Sep; 36(9):1960-6. PubMed ID: 16109908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.