These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20971777)

  • 1. Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed during CT: what good are they?
    Huda W; Mettler FA
    Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):236-42. PubMed ID: 20971777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating the effective radiation dose imparted to patients by intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography in thoracolumbar spinal surgery.
    Lange J; Karellas A; Street J; Eck JC; Lapinsky A; Connolly PJ; Dipaola CP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Mar; 38(5):E306-12. PubMed ID: 23238490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Searching for the holy grail: the pretense and fallacy of measuring CT radiation exposure in an individual patient.
    Cohen MD
    Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):306-7; author reply 307-8. PubMed ID: 21697314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Personalized assessment of kV cone beam computed tomography doses in image-guided radiotherapy of pediatric cancer patients.
    Zhang Y; Yan Y; Nath R; Bao S; Deng J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Aug; 83(5):1649-54. PubMed ID: 22285667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of new technologies on dose reduction in CT.
    Lee TY; Chhem RK
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Oct; 76(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 20643522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation dose and excess risk of cancer in children undergoing neuroangiography.
    Raelson CA; Kanal KM; Vavilala MS; Rivara FP; Kim LJ; Stewart BK; Cohen WA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1621-8. PubMed ID: 19933657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CT dose: how to measure, how to reduce.
    McCollough CH
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):508-17. PubMed ID: 18849683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation-related cancer risks in a clinical patient population undergoing cardiac CT.
    Huda W; Schoepf UJ; Abro JA; Mah E; Costello P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):W159-65. PubMed ID: 21257857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Triple-rule-out computed tomography angiography with 256-slice computed tomography scanners: patient-specific assessment of radiation burden and associated cancer risk.
    Perisinakis K; Seimenis I; Tzedakis A; Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 21857528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of patient exposure to X-radiation from SPECT/CT scanners.
    Hara N; Onoguchi M; Takenaka K; Matsubara K; Ujita H; Kenko Y
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2010 Sep; 38(3):138-48. PubMed ID: 20807855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computed tomography and radiation: understanding the issues.
    Frush DP; Applegate K
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 17411538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SPECT-CT in routine clinical practice: increase in patient radiation dose compared with SPECT alone.
    Sharma P; Sharma S; Ballal S; Bal C; Malhotra A; Kumar R
    Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Sep; 33(9):926-32. PubMed ID: 22692583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated framework for digital radiation dose index reporting from CT dose reports.
    Shih G; Lu ZF; Zabih R; Kennedy D; Loftus M; Shih WJ; Osborne J; Nickoloff E; Schwartz L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):1170-4. PubMed ID: 22021511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system.
    Zhang J; Weir V; Fajardo L; Lin J; Hsiung H; Ritenour ER
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 19923687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Digital volume tomography (DVT) and multislice spiral CT (MSCT): an objective examination of dose and image quality].
    Kyriakou Y; Kolditz D; Langner O; Krause J; Kalender W
    Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 20922645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose and image quality evaluation of a dedicated cone-beam CT system for high-contrast neurologic applications.
    Yu L; Vrieze TJ; Bruesewitz MR; Kofler JM; DeLone DR; Pallanch JF; Lindell EP; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):W193-201. PubMed ID: 20093573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of natural background dose rates for residents of the Amargosa Valley, NV, to those in Leadville, CO, and the states of Colorado and Nevada.
    Moeller DW; Sun LS
    Health Phys; 2006 Oct; 91(4):338-53. PubMed ID: 16966877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Techniques and parameters for estimating radiation exposure and dose in cardiac computed tomography.
    Gerber TC; Kuzo RS; Morin RL
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2005 Feb; 21(1):165-76. PubMed ID: 15915949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation dose in computed tomography: why it's a concern and what you can do about it.
    Health Devices; 2007 Feb; 36(2):41-2, 44-63. PubMed ID: 17405417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Embryo dose estimates in body CT.
    Huda W; Randazzo W; Tipnis S; Frey GD; Mah E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):874-80. PubMed ID: 20308485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.