105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20971972)
1. Ghostwriters and Guest-writers.
Reider B
Am J Sports Med; 2010 Nov; 38(11):2183-5. PubMed ID: 20971972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ghostwriters in the fray: the implications for science, industry, medical journals, and our patients.
Salcido R
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 Nov; 22(11):494-6. PubMed ID: 20026926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical contributions to research articles by medical writers.
Shashok K
Anesth Analg; 2013 Feb; 116(2):500-3. PubMed ID: 23340749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Re: Ghost writers in the sky.
Michel MC
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):788; discussion 788. PubMed ID: 18555489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Goodbye Ghostwriters!: How to work ethically and efficiently with professional medical writers.
Woolley KL
Chest; 2006 Sep; 130(3):921-3. PubMed ID: 16963697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethics code for professional medical writers emphasises transparency and completeness of research reporting.
Mayor S
BMJ; 2010 Dec; 341():c7025. PubMed ID: 21147749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comments on European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications.
Foote M; Hamilton CW; Mallia-Hughes M
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 May; 21(5):703-4; author reply 704. PubMed ID: 15969869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. On writing for publication.
Lemery LD
Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2001; 15(5):319-30. PubMed ID: 11586923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethics and the Reporting of Research Findings.
Milton CL
Nurs Sci Q; 2019 Jan; 32(1):23-24. PubMed ID: 30798763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ghost writers in the sky.
J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):809-10. PubMed ID: 18221969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tips to improve your manuscript and make the editor happy.
Coleman R
Acta Histochem; 2007; 109(5):343-6. PubMed ID: 17568660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fraud in scientific publishing.
Scully C; Baum B
Oral Dis; 2006 Jul; 12(4):357. PubMed ID: 16792718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The dark side of scientific research.
McDonald JC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(3):231-2. PubMed ID: 16772306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Authorship in forensic psychiatry: a perspective.
Simon RI
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 17389340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pediatric research and scholarship: another Gordian knot?
Tobin JR; Shafer SL; Davis PJ
Anesth Analg; 2006 Jul; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 16790623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The involvement of professional medical writers in medical publications.
Daskalopoulou SS; Mikhailidis DP
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Feb; 21(2):307-10. PubMed ID: 15802002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ghost marketing: pharmaceutical companies and ghostwritten journal articles.
Moffatt B; Elliott C
Perspect Biol Med; 2007; 50(1):18-31. PubMed ID: 17259673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use.
Nature; 2023 Jan; 613(7945):612. PubMed ID: 36694020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Writing about patients: what clinical and literary writers share.
Miller E
J Am Psychoanal Assoc; 2009 Oct; 57(5):1097-120. PubMed ID: 19734448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What makes a high quality clinical research paper?
Groves T
Oral Dis; 2010 May; 16(4):313-5. PubMed ID: 20233312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
