These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2097228)

  • 1. Parameters affecting radiographic contrast.
    Frederiksen NL; Goaz PW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 Nov; 19(4):173-7. PubMed ID: 2097228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on the sensitometric responses of dental radiographic films.
    Price C; McDonnell D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 1884846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variations in film exposure, effective kVp, and HVL among thirty-five dental x-ray units.
    Preece JW; Jensen CW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Dec; 56(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 6581465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of scattered radiation and tube potential on radiographic contrast: comparison of two different dental X-ray films.
    Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O; Sandborg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):135-46. PubMed ID: 1807997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on image quality in dental radiography. 1: Subjective assessment and contrast.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Nov; 20(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 1808011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of contrast equalization on energy imparted to the patient: a comparison of two dental generators and two types of intraoral film.
    Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 7835508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Kilovoltage peak and half value layer relationships of a dental X-ray machine.
    Patel JR
    Indian J Dent Res; 1992; 3(2):31-5. PubMed ID: 1343955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting x-ray spectra.
    Nickoloff EL; Berman HL
    Radiographics; 1993 Nov; 13(6):1337-48. PubMed ID: 8290728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of additional filtration on image quality in dental radiography: comparison of niobium with aluminium.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 1397460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Compact foreign-made dental x-ray generators: an evaluation of their acceptability for effective dental radiography. II. Image characteristics and observer performance.
    Saulnier VE; Barr JH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1975 Jan; 39(1):158-73. PubMed ID: 1053674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal processing of Ektaspeed dental film.
    Fjellström CA; Fredholm U; Julin P; Rehnmark S
    Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(4):137-43. PubMed ID: 3466376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developing solutions for dental X-ray processors.
    Hedin M
    Swed Dent J; 1989; 13(6):261-5. PubMed ID: 2603130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. X-ray production variability.
    Buchholz RE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1975 Aug; 40(2):282-4. PubMed ID: 1057152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response of air, silicon and dosimetric films to x-ray spectra of various qualities.
    Paix D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1992 Dec; 15(4):202-7. PubMed ID: 1482340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A penetrameter for measuring peak kilovoltage of dental X-ray sets.
    Beeching BW
    Br J Radiol; 1980 Feb; 53(626):120-5. PubMed ID: 7370492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Image contrast in various cassette-screen-film combinations].
    Barth HH; Grasser H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Dec; 40(12):1230-4. PubMed ID: 3869536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Control of exposure times of dental X-ray units].
    Chemnitius W; Köcher E
    Stomatol DDR; 1989 Feb; 39(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 2815164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on the attenuation of dental X-ray beams by water.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 May; 20(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 1936421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.