These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2097228)

  • 41. A response to "No Kilovoltage Dilemma".
    Pentel L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1967 Sep; 24(3):364. PubMed ID: 5234267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Compact foreign-made x-ray generators: an evaluation of their acceptability for effective dental radiography.
    Saulnier VE; Barr JH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1975 Jan; 4(1):66. PubMed ID: 25629865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The contrast problem in high kilovoltage medical radiography.
    NEMET A; COX WF; HILLS TH
    Br J Radiol; 1953 Apr; 26(304):185-92. PubMed ID: 13042083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. High kilovoltage radiography.
    MERRILL HF
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1960 Nov; 32():259-60. PubMed ID: 13769707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The use of high kilovoltage in diagnostic radiography.
    CHESNEY MO
    Radiography; 1962 Feb; 28():46-57. PubMed ID: 13878805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Kilovoltage conversion in radiography.
    SCHWARZ GS
    Xray Tech; 1960 Jan; 31():373-9. PubMed ID: 14444059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Quantitative Study on the Interrelationship between Information Value and X-Ray Dose in the Dental Radiogram.
    Nishioka T; Mimura S; Yoshioka T; Nishiyama S; Suzuki S; Ando S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1975 Jan; 4(1):64. PubMed ID: 25629854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. High Kilovoltage Radiographic Technique.
    Hickman EA
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1953 May; 45(3):228-9. PubMed ID: 20893670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on the sensitometric responses of dental radiographic films.
    Price C; McDonnell D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 1884846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Variations in film exposure, effective kVp, and HVL among thirty-five dental x-ray units.
    Preece JW; Jensen CW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Dec; 56(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 6581465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of scattered radiation and tube potential on radiographic contrast: comparison of two different dental X-ray films.
    Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O; Sandborg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):135-46. PubMed ID: 1807997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on image quality in dental radiography. 1: Subjective assessment and contrast.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Nov; 20(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 1808011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Parameters affecting radiographic contrast.
    Frederiksen NL; Goaz PW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 Nov; 19(4):173-7. PubMed ID: 2097228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]     [New Search]
    of 3.