These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20972775)

  • 1. Comparison of length judgments and the Müller-Lyer illusion in monkeys and humans.
    Tudusciuc O; Nieder A
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Dec; 207(3-4):221-31. PubMed ID: 20972775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
    Suganuma E; Pessoa VF; Monge-Fuentes V; Castro BM; Tavares MC
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 182(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 17586063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The neural mechanisms underlying the Müller-Lyer illusion and its interaction with visuospatial judgments.
    Weidner R; Fink GR
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Apr; 17(4):878-84. PubMed ID: 16707733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring the Jastrow Illusion in Humans ( Homo sapiens), Rhesus Monkeys ( Macaca mulatta), and Capuchin Monkeys ( Sapajus apella).
    Agrillo C; Beran MJ; Parrish AE
    Perception; 2019 May; 48(5):367-385. PubMed ID: 30913960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of practice versus information on the visual illusion.
    Khorasani AA; Fadardi JS; Fadardi MS; Cox WM; Sharif JT
    Neurosci Bull; 2007 Jan; 23(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 17592522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time course of the effect of the Muller-Lyer illusion on saccades and perceptual judgments.
    de Brouwer AJ; Brenner E; Medendorp WP; Smeets JB
    J Vis; 2014 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 24396047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The elusive illusion: Do children (Homo sapiens) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) see the Solitaire illusion?
    Parrish AE; Agrillo C; Perdue BM; Beran MJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Feb; 142():83-95. PubMed ID: 26513327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual spatial illusions: a general explanation.
    Day RH
    Science; 1972 Mar; 175(4028):1335-40. PubMed ID: 5059563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ventral and dorsal stream interactions during the perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion: evidence derived from fMRI and dynamic causal modeling.
    Plewan T; Weidner R; Eickhoff SB; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 24(10):2015-29. PubMed ID: 22721374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Müller-Lyer illusion in patients with schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease.
    Tolmacheva EA; Ognivov VV; Shevelenkova TD; Bastakov VA
    Schizophr Res; 2018 Nov; 201():418-419. PubMed ID: 29853251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do primates see the solitaire illusion differently? A comparative assessment of humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
    Agrillo C; Parrish AE; Beran MJ
    J Comp Psychol; 2014 Nov; 128(4):402-13. PubMed ID: 25133464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Delayed pointing movements to masked Müller-Lyer figures are affected by target size but not the illusion.
    de Wit M; van der Kamp J; Masters RS
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1903-9. PubMed ID: 21420989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of perceived length on numerosity estimation: Evidence from the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Dormal V; Larigaldie N; Lefèvre N; Pesenti M; Andres M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2142-2151. PubMed ID: 30226431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How does action resist visual illusion? Uncorrected oculomotor information does not account for accurate pointing in peripersonal space.
    Bernardis P; Knox P; Bruno N
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 15791463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When illusions merge.
    Cretenoud AF; Francis G; Herzog MH
    J Vis; 2020 Aug; 20(8):12. PubMed ID: 32766743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-related differences in a delayed pointing of a Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Rival C; Olivier I; Ceyte H; Ferrel C
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Dec; 153(3):378-81. PubMed ID: 14513301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combined visual illusion effects on the perceived index of difficulty and movement outcomes in discrete and continuous fitts' tapping.
    Alphonsa S; Dai B; Benham-Deal T; Zhu Q
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jan; 80(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 25535018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pointing and antipointing in Müller-Lyer figures: Why illusion effects need to be scaled.
    Hesse C; Franz VH; Schenk T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jan; 42(1):90-102. PubMed ID: 26322691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The temporal dynamics of the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Weidner R; Boers F; Mathiak K; Dammers J; Fink GR
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1586-95. PubMed ID: 19875676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Keeping a target in memory does not increase the effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccades.
    de Brouwer AJ; Brenner E; Smeets JB
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 234(4):977-83. PubMed ID: 26686530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.