These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20972856)
1. Accurate measurement of pulsatile flow velocity in a small tube phantom: comparison of phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging and intraluminal Doppler guidewire. Machida H; Komori Y; Ueno E; Shen Y; Hirata M; Kojima S; Sato M; Okazaki T; Masukawa A; Morita S; Suzuki K Jpn J Radiol; 2010 Oct; 28(8):571-7. PubMed ID: 20972856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial factors for quantifying constant flow velocity in a small tube phantom: comparison of phase-contrast cine-magnetic resonance imaging and the intraluminal Doppler guidewire method. Machida H; Komori Y; Ueno E; Shen Y; Hirata M; Kojima S; Morita S; Sato M; Okazaki T Jpn J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 27(9):335-41. PubMed ID: 19943143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flow quantification using fast cine phase-contrast MR imaging, conventional cine phase-contrast MR imaging, and Doppler sonography: in vitro and in vivo validation. Lee VS; Spritzer CE; Carroll BA; Pool LG; Bernstein MA; Heinle SK; MacFall JR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1125-31. PubMed ID: 9308476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro agreement between magnetic resonance imaging and intraluminal Doppler ultrasound for high flow velocity measurements. Matre K; Ersland L; Larsen TH; Andersen E Scand Cardiovasc J; 2002 May; 36(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 12079639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Real-time phase contrast MRI versus conventional phase contrast MRI at different spatial resolutions and velocity encodings. Liu P; Fall S; Ahiatsi M; Balédent O Clin Imaging; 2023 Feb; 94():93-102. PubMed ID: 36502617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated measurement and classification of pulmonary blood-flow velocity patterns using phase-contrast MRI and correlation analysis. van Amerom JF; Kellenberger CJ; Yoo SJ; Macgowan CK Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 27(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 18650044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of Spatial Resolution in Three-dimensional Cine Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging on the Accuracy of Hemodynamic Analysis. Fukuyama A; Isoda H; Morita K; Mori M; Watanabe T; Ishiguro K; Komori Y; Kosugi T Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Oct; 16(4):311-316. PubMed ID: 28132996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of acquisition parameters on the accuracy of velocity encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging blood flow measurements. Greil G; Geva T; Maier SE; Powell AJ J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Jan; 15(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11793456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In-vitro validation of 4D flow MRI measurements with an experimental pulsatile flow model. David A; Le Touze D; Warin-Fresse K; Paul-Gilloteaux P; Bonnefoy F; Idier J; Moussaoui S; Guerin P; Serfaty JM Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Jan; 100(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 30241970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the time-velocity curve in phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: a phantom study. Park J; Kim J; Chang Y; Youn SW; Lee HJ; Kang EJ; Lee KN; Suchánek V; Hyun S; Lee J Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2019 Oct; 24(sup2):3-12. PubMed ID: 31385716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shared velocity encoding: a method to improve the temporal resolution of phase-contrast velocity measurements. Lin HY; Bender JA; Ding Y; Chung YC; Hinton AM; Pennell ML; Whitehead KK; Raman SV; Simonetti OP Magn Reson Med; 2012 Sep; 68(3):703-10. PubMed ID: 22139889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phase-velocity cine magnetic resonance imaging measurement of pulsatile blood flow in children and young adults: in vitro and in vivo validation. Powell AJ; Maier SE; Chung T; Geva T Pediatr Cardiol; 2000; 21(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 10754076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Noninvasive assessment of the infarct-related coronary artery blood flow velocity using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging after coronary angioplasty. Furber AP; Lethimonnier F; Le Jeune JJ; Balzer P; Jallet P; Tadéi A; Geslin P Am J Cardiol; 1999 Jul; 84(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 10404846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping through NiTi stents in a flow phantom model. Walsh EG; Holton AD; Brott BC; Venugopalan R; Anayiotos AS J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jan; 21(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 15611949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging kappa-space segmentation using phase-encoding groups the accuracy of quantitative measurements of pulsatile flow. Li H; Clarke GD; NessAvier M; Liu H; Peshock R Med Phys; 1995 Apr; 22(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 7609719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Microfluidics-based Pulpal Arteriole Blood Flow Phantom for Validation of Doppler Ultrasound Devices in Pulpal Blood Flow Velocity Measurement. Kim D; Park SH J Endod; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1660-1666. PubMed ID: 27651041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An investigation of the relationship between ultrasound echo enhancement and Doppler frequency shift using a pulsatile arterial flow phantom. Petrick J; Zomack M; Schlief R Invest Radiol; 1997 Apr; 32(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 9101358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correction of temporal misregistration artifacts in jet flow by conventional phase-contrast MRI. Doyle M; Kortright E; Anayiotos AS; Rayarao G; Rathi VK; Caruppannan K; Li L; Biederman RW J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jun; 25(6):1256-62. PubMed ID: 17520724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and reproducibility of a novel dual-beam vector Doppler method. Ricci S; Diciotti S; Francalanci L; Tortoli P Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 May; 35(5):829-38. PubMed ID: 19110369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]