453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20972947)
1. The impact of first trimester screening and early fetal anomaly scan on invasive testing rates in women with advanced maternal age.
Hagen A; Entezami M; Gasiorek-Wiens A; Albig M; Becker R; Knoll U; Stumm M; Wegner RD
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jun; 32(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 20972947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.
Chitayat D; Langlois S; Douglas Wilson R; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):736-750. PubMed ID: 21749752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of aneuploidy in twin pregnancies.
Audibert F; Gagnon A; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):754-67. PubMed ID: 21749753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF CELL-FREE DNA ANALYSIS IN MATERNAL BLOOD IN SCREENING FOR ANEUPLOIDIES IN SINGLETON PREGNANCIES].
Chaveeva P; Yankova M; Stratieva V; Dimitrov I; Shterev A
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2016; 55(2):10-5. PubMed ID: 27509651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond the first trimester screen: can we predict who will choose invasive testing?
van Landingham S; Bienstock J; Wood Denne E; Hueppchen N
Genet Med; 2011 Jun; 13(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 21415760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening for fetal aneuploidy.
Rink BD; Norton ME
Semin Perinatol; 2016 Feb; 40(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26725144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for trisomies by cell-free DNA testing of maternal blood: consequences of a failed result.
Revello R; Sarno L; Ispas A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 47(6):698-704. PubMed ID: 26743020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [First-trimester screening for trisomies 18 and 13 with the combined use of the risk algorithms for trisomy 21, 18 and 13].
Lüthgens K; Hoopmann M; Alkier R; Abele H; Yazdi B; Kagan K
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E57-E61. PubMed ID: 22274905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Population-based trends in invasive prenatal diagnosis for ultrasound-based indications: two decades of change from 1994 to 2016.
Lostchuck E; Poulton A; Halliday J; Hui L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):503-511. PubMed ID: 29877030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noninvasive prenatal testing in routine clinical practice--an audit of NIPT and combined first-trimester screening in an unselected Australian population.
McLennan A; Palma-Dias R; da Silva Costa F; Meagher S; Nisbet DL; Scott F
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Feb; 56(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 26817523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trends in timing of prenatal diagnosis and abortion for fetal chromosomal abnormalities.
Hume H; Chasen ST
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):545.e1-4. PubMed ID: 26070711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new era in prenatal care: non-invasive prenatal testing in Switzerland.
Manegold-Brauer G; Kang Bellin A; Hahn S; De Geyter C; Buechel J; Hoesli I; Lapaire O
Swiss Med Wkly; 2014 Feb; 144():w13915. PubMed ID: 24549748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening.
Bianchi DW; Parker RL; Wentworth J; Madankumar R; Saffer C; Das AF; Craig JA; Chudova DI; Devers PL; Jones KW; Oliver K; Rava RP; Sehnert AJ;
N Engl J Med; 2014 Feb; 370(9):799-808. PubMed ID: 24571752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Noninvasive prenatal testing: impact on genetic counseling, invasive prenatal diagnosis, and trisomy 21 detection.
Wax JR; Cartin A; Chard R; Lucas FL; Pinette MG
J Clin Ultrasound; 2015 Jan; 43(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 25303161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities by low-coverage whole-genome sequencing of maternal plasma DNA: review of 1982 consecutive cases in a single center.
Lau TK; Cheung SW; Lo PS; Pursley AN; Chan MK; Jiang F; Zhang H; Wang W; Jong LF; Yuen OK; Chan HY; Chan WS; Choy KW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 43(3):254-64. PubMed ID: 24339153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects.
Benn P; Cuckle H; Pergament E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jul; 42(1):15-33. PubMed ID: 23765643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The prenatal detection of trisomy 13, 18, and 21: comparison of the advanced first trimester screening (AFS) with the first trimester screening according to Nicolaides].
Hörmansdörfer C; Schmidt P; Hillemanns P; Scharf A
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2007 Dec; 211(6):243-9. PubMed ID: 18176905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non-invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13.
Papageorghiou AT; Khalil A; Forman M; Hulme R; Mazey R; Mousa HA; Johnstone ED; McKelvey A; Cohen KE; Risley M; Denman W; Kelly B
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 47(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 26493543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive predictive value estimates for cell-free noninvasive prenatal screening from data of a large referral genetic diagnostic laboratory.
Petersen AK; Cheung SW; Smith JL; Bi W; Ward PA; Peacock S; Braxton A; Van Den Veyver IB; Breman AM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 217(6):691.e1-691.e6. PubMed ID: 29032050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of a DNA method, QF-PCR, in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies.
Langlois S; Duncan A; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Sep; 33(9):955-960. PubMed ID: 21923994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
