BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20974032)

  • 1. Significance of prostate weight on peri and postoperative outcomes of robot assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Editorial comment.
    Zorn KC
    Can J Urol; 2010 Oct; 17(5):5389. PubMed ID: 20974032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Significance of prostate weight on peri and postoperative outcomes of robot assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy.
    Allaparthi SB; Hoang T; Dhanani NN; Tuerk IA
    Can J Urol; 2010 Oct; 17(5):5383-9. PubMed ID: 20974031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Editorial comment on: robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of 184 cases.
    Artibani W
    Eur Urol; 2007 Sep; 52(3):750-1. PubMed ID: 17329018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
    Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Editorial comment on: Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.
    Cestari A; Guazzoni G
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1367. PubMed ID: 19147271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Link BA; Nelson R; Josephson DY; Yoshida JS; Crocitto LE; Kawachi MH; Wilson TG
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):928-32. PubMed ID: 18635217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Editorial comment. Impact of prostate weight on probability of positive surgical margins in patients with low-risk prostate cancer after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA
    Urology; 2011 Mar; 77(3):681. PubMed ID: 21377017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of prolonged operative time during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Yong DZ; Tsivian M; Zilberman DE; Ferrandino MN; Mouraviev V; Albala DM
    BJU Int; 2011 Jan; 107(2):280-2. PubMed ID: 20707799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Striving for Trifecta outcomes in localised prostate cancer.
    Barnett C; Kumar P; Challacombe B; Dasgupta P
    Minerva Med; 2011 Aug; 102(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 21959706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Prostatectomy-pros and cons on open surgery/laparoscopic surgery/robot-assisted surgery].
    Abe M; Kawano Y; Kameyama S
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2011 Dec; 38(13):2542-7. PubMed ID: 22189218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prostate weight: an independent predictor for positive surgical margins during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Msezane LP; Gofrit ON; Lin S; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP; Zorn KC
    Can J Urol; 2007 Oct; 14(5):3697-701. PubMed ID: 17949525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a report of the current state.
    Patel VR; Shah K; Palmer KJ; Thaly R; Coughlin G
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2007 Sep; 7(9):1269-78. PubMed ID: 17892427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
    Nelson B; Kaufman M; Broughton G; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Baumgartner RG; Smith JA
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31. PubMed ID: 17296378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of robotics for prostate cancer.
    McCullough TC; Barret E; Cathelineau X; Rozet F; Galiano M; Vallancien G
    Curr Opin Urol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 19057219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pure and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technology and techniques merge to improve outcomes.
    Pow-Sang J
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2008 Jan; 8(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 18095879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Are functional outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than those obtained with other surgical approaches?].
    RouprĂȘt M
    Prog Urol; 2009 Oct; 19(9):617-8. PubMed ID: 19800551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP)--a new surgical treatment for cancer of the prostate.
    Wilson LC; Pickford JE; Gilling PJ
    N Z Med J; 2008 Dec; 121(1287):32-8. PubMed ID: 19098965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of 184 cases.
    Mottrie A; Van Migem P; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Carpentier P; Fonteyne E
    Eur Urol; 2007 Sep; 52(3):746-50. PubMed ID: 17329020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Editorial comment on: oncologic outcome after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: midterm follow-up of 1115 procedures.
    Touijer K
    Eur Urol; 2010 Feb; 57(2):273. PubMed ID: 19775808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.