301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20974356)
1. Lymph node imaging in gynecologic malignancy.
Lai G; Rockall AG
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2010 Oct; 31(5):363-76. PubMed ID: 20974356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pearls and pitfalls of MR lymphography in gynecologic malignancy.
Narayanan P; Iyngkaran T; Sohaib SA; Reznek RH; Rockall AG
Radiographics; 2009; 29(4):1057-69; discussion 1069-71. PubMed ID: 19605656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance lymphography: a novel technique for lymph node assessment in gynecologic malignancies.
Narayanan P; Iyngkaran T; Sohaib SA; Reznek RH; Rockall AG
Cancer Biomark; 2009; 5(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 19414925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lymph node imaging: basic principles.
Luciani A; Itti E; Rahmouni A; Meignan M; Clement O
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 16473489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imaging of cervical lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: the basics.
Gor DM; Langer JE; Loevner LA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2006 Jan; 44(1):101-10, viii. PubMed ID: 16297684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nodal staging.
Ganeshalingam S; Koh DM
Cancer Imaging; 2009 Dec; 9(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 20080453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. FDG positron emission tomography detection of pelvic nodal metastases in gynecologic cancer.
Siegel BA; Adler LP; Wahl RL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Mar; 178(3):762-4. PubMed ID: 11856715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Problems and prospects of modern lymph node imaging.
Wunderbaldinger P
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 16464553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Lymph node metastasis: ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging versus PET/CT in a rabbit model.
Choi SH; Moon WK; Hong JH; Son KR; Cho N; Kwon BJ; Lee JJ; Chung JK; Min HS; Park SH
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):137-43. PubMed ID: 17090719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of multifocality and axillary nodal involvement in early-stage breast cancer patients using 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and sentinel node biopsy.
Ergul N; Kadioglu H; Yildiz S; Yucel SB; Gucin Z; Erdogan EB; Aydin M; Muslumanoglu M
Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):917-23. PubMed ID: 25013091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lymphotropic nanoparticle enhanced MR imaging (LNMRI) technique for lymph node imaging.
Saksena MA; Saokar A; Harisinghani MG
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 16472955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Novel imaging modalities for lymph node imaging in urologic oncology.
Chernyak V
Urol Clin North Am; 2011 Nov; 38(4):471-81, vii. PubMed ID: 22045178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of pelvic lymph node metastases in gynecologic malignancy: a comparison of CT, MR imaging, and positron emission tomography.
Williams AD; Cousins C; Soutter WP; Mubashar M; Peters AM; Dina R; Fuchsel F; McIndoe GA; deSouza NM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):343-8. PubMed ID: 11461859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective trial comparing lymphangiogram, cross-sectional imaging, and positron emission tomography scan in the detection of lymph node metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Small W; Vern TZ; Rademaker A; Nemcek A; Spies S; Schink JC; Singh DK; Lurain JR
Am J Clin Oncol; 2010 Feb; 33(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 19730352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current concepts in lymph node imaging.
Torabi M; Aquino SL; Harisinghani MG
J Nucl Med; 2004 Sep; 45(9):1509-18. PubMed ID: 15347718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PET/CT imaging in gynecologic malignancies: a critical overview of its clinical impact and our retrospective single center analysis.
Dalla Palma M; Gregianin M; Fiduccia P; Evangelista L; Cervino AR; Saladini G; Borgato L; Nicoletto MO; Zagonel V
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2012 Jul; 83(1):84-98. PubMed ID: 22245509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. FDG-PET staging of head and neck cancer--can improved imaging lead to improved treatment?
Schwartz DL; Macapinlac HA; Weber RS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):688-9. PubMed ID: 18477798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pathways of lymphatic spread in gynecologic malignancies.
Paño B; Sebastià C; Ripoll E; Paredes P; Salvador R; Buñesch L; Nicolau C
Radiographics; 2015; 35(3):916-45. PubMed ID: 25969940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Additional value of MR/PET fusion compared with PET/CT in the detection of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients.
Kim SK; Choi HJ; Park SY; Lee HY; Seo SS; Yoo CW; Jung DC; Kang S; Cho KS
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Aug; 45(12):2103-9. PubMed ID: 19403303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Urinary bladder cancer: preoperative nodal staging with ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MR imaging.
Montie JE
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):870-1. PubMed ID: 16093977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
