These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20974447)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of anchorage systems for micro implant orthodontics.
    Favero L; Giagnorio C; Cocilovo F
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):105-17. PubMed ID: 20974447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of stainless steel and titanium alloy orthodontic miniscrew implants: a mechanical and histologic analysis.
    Brown RN; Sexton BE; Gabriel Chu TM; Katona TR; Stewart KT; Kyung HM; Liu SS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 24703288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical properties evaluation of an orthodontic miniscrew system for skeletal anchorage.
    Francioli D; Ruggiero G; Giorgetti R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 20974446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels.
    Chatzigianni A; Keilig L; Reimann S; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 21062964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Removal torque values of surface-treated mini-implants after loading.
    Kim SH; Cho JH; Chung KR; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18617101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Titanium alloy mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: immediate loading and metal ion release.
    Morais LS; Serra GG; Muller CA; Andrade LR; Palermo EF; Elias CN; Meyers M
    Acta Biomater; 2007 May; 3(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 17257912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of retrieved orthodontic miniscrew implants.
    Eliades T; Zinelis S; Papadopoulos MA; Eliades G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):10.e1-7; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 19121491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of different implant materials on the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Pan CY; Chou ST; Tseng YC; Yang YH; Wu CY; Lan TH; Liu PH; Chang HP
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2012 Dec; 28(12):673-8. PubMed ID: 23217360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Biomechanical comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic micro-implants].
    Chen Y; Zhao WT; Kyung HM
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 42(10):605-7. PubMed ID: 18215368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of mini-implant diameter on fracture risk and self-drilling efficacy.
    Barros SE; Janson G; Chiqueto K; Garib DG; Janson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e181-92. PubMed ID: 21967956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Micrographic study and torsional strength of grade 23 titanium mini-implants recycled for orthodontic purposes.
    Kaci N; Hakem K; Laraba S; Benrekaa N; Le Gall M
    Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):246-257. PubMed ID: 29628423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pitch and longitudinal fluting effects on the primary stability of miniscrew implants.
    Brinley CL; Behrents R; Kim KB; Condoor S; Kyung HM; Buschang PH
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1156-61. PubMed ID: 19852609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical and histological comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants in dogs.
    Chen Y; Shin HI; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18174070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
    Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Potential of self-drilling orthodontic microimplants under immediate loading.
    Chen Y; Lee JW; Cho WH; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 20362909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of surface characteristics on survival rates of mini-implants.
    Chaddad K; Ferreira AF; Geurs N; Reddy MS
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 18193961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-invasive removal of sandblasted and acid-etched titanium palatal implants, a retrospective study.
    Kuhn M; Göllner P; Schätzle M; Hänggi MP
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):584-8. PubMed ID: 25667039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical properties of self-drilling orthodontic micro-implants with different diameters.
    Chen Y; Kyung HM; Gao L; Yu WJ; Bae EJ; Kim SM
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):821-7. PubMed ID: 20578851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of orthodontic mini-implants: a biomechanical in vitro study.
    Wilmes B; Panayotidis A; Drescher D
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 21310766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.