BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20974456)

  • 1. A simple and efficient procedure for indirect bonding.
    Cortesi R; Molinari L
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 20974456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A simple and quick method for indirect retention].
    Muller C; Hitmi L; Roussarie F; Attal JP
    Orthod Fr; 2009 Jun; 80(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 19552883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of transparent vinyl polysiloxane in a minimally invasive approach for creating composite resin undercuts for partial removable dental prostheses.
    Varjão FM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jan; 107(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 22230916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with the custom base indirect bonding technique.
    Yagci A; Uysal T; Ulker M; Ramoglu SI
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 19752016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bonding techniques in lingual orthodontics.
    Paul W
    J Orthod; 2013 Sep; 40 Suppl 1():S20-6. PubMed ID: 24005947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are flowable resin-based composites a reliable material for metal orthodontic bracket bonding?
    Pick B; Rosa V; Azeredo TR; Cruz Filho EA; Miranda WG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jul; 11(4):E017-24. PubMed ID: 20953560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer.
    Hosein I; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):717-24. PubMed ID: 15592221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of loading mode on bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with 2 systems.
    Katona TR; Long RW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 16443480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Should silane coupling agents be used when bonding brackets to composite restorations? An in vitro study.
    Eslamian L; Ghassemi A; Amini F; Jafari A; Afrand M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 19193708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bracket bonding with 15- or 60-second etching and adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding.
    Osorio R; Toledano M; Garcia-Godoy F
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 10022184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel with amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite.
    Uysal T; Ustdal A; Nur M; Catalbas B
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 20080960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of modifying the bonding protocol on the shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Fernandes TM; Janson G; Somensi J; Pinzan A; Francisconi PA; Sathler R; Henriques JF
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22313980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study on direct and indirect bracket bonding techniques regarding time length and bracket detachment.
    Bozelli JV; Bigliazzi R; Barbosa HA; Ortolani CL; Bertoz FA; Faltin Junior K
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):51-7. PubMed ID: 24351150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of flowable composites for orthodontic bracket bonding.
    Ryou DB; Park HS; Kim KH; Kwon TY
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1105-9. PubMed ID: 18947267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combinations of etchants, composite resins, and bracket systems: an important choice in orthodontic bonding procedures.
    Urabe H; Rossouw PE; Titley KC; Yamin C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 10371434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
    Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modified bonding technique for a standardized and effective indirect bonding procedure.
    Ciuffolo F; Tenisci N; Pollutri L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):504-9. PubMed ID: 22464533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.