These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
28. Carotid artery velocity characteristics after carotid artery angioplasty and stenting. Chahwan S; Miller MT; Pigott JP; Whalen RC; Jones L; Comerota AJ J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 17257803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: technical and team training in an immersive virtual reality environment. Rudarakanchana N; Van Herzeele I; Bicknell CD; Riga CV; Rolls A; Cheshire NJ; Hamady MS Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2014 Aug; 37(4):920-7. PubMed ID: 24196270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Early and late outcomes of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of cephalad arteries. Buszman P; Debiński M; Gruszka A; Janas P; Król M; Kondys M; Iwiński J; Kazibutowska-Zarańska Z; Cierpka L; Tendera M Kardiol Pol; 2008 Mar; 66(3):233-42, discussion 243. PubMed ID: 18393110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Feasibility and safety of transbrachial approach for patients with severe carotid artery stenosis undergoing stenting. Wu CJ; Cheng CI; Hung WC; Fang CY; Yang CH; Chen CJ; Chen YH; Hang CL; Hsieh YK; Chen SM; Yip HK Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Jun; 67(6):967-71. PubMed ID: 16649240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Virtual reality simulation for the optimization of endovascular procedures: current perspectives. Rudarakanchana N; Van Herzeele I; Desender L; Cheshire NJ Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2015; 11():195-202. PubMed ID: 25792841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Can IVUS-virtual histology improve outcomes of percutaneous carotid treatment? Inglese L; Fantoni C; Sardana V J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2009 Dec; 50(6):735-44. PubMed ID: 19935604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Carotid artery stenting compared to carotid endarterectomy performed exclusively in a veteran population: one center's experience with midterm results. Brown KE; Fanciullo DJ; Hicks T; Landau DS; Baraniewski HM; Morasch MD; Matsumura JS; Pearce WH; Eskandari MK; Kibbe MR Ann Surg; 2008 Jul; 248(1):110-6. PubMed ID: 18580214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The value of intravascular ultrasound-facilitated internal carotid artery stenting in a patient with heavily calcified and ambiguous common carotid artery stenosis. Tresukosol D; Wongpraparut N; Lirdvilai T J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 Jul; 19(7):E203-6. PubMed ID: 17620688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Real case virtual reality training prior to carotid artery stenting. Roguin A; Beyar R Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Feb; 75(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 19787804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Visuospatial and psychomotor aptitude predicts endovascular performance of inexperienced individuals on a virtual reality simulator. Van Herzeele I; O'Donoghue KG; Aggarwal R; Vermassen F; Darzi A; Cheshire NJ J Vasc Surg; 2010 Apr; 51(4):1035-42. PubMed ID: 20347702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Transradial and transbrachial arterial approach for simultaneous carotid angiographic examination and stenting using catheter looping and retrograde engagement technique. Fang HY; Chung SY; Sun CK; Youssef AA; Bhasin A; Tsai TH; Yang CH; Chen CJ; Hussein H; Wu CJ; Yip HK Ann Vasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 24(5):670-9. PubMed ID: 20363587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Management of in-sent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients. Zhou W; Lin PH; Bush RL; Peden EK; Guerrero MA; Kougias P; Lumsden AB J Vasc Surg; 2006 Feb; 43(2):305-12. PubMed ID: 16476606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]