These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Tracking objects that move where they are headed. Jardine NL; Seiffert AE Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2168-79. PubMed ID: 21769535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy. Gao T; Newman GE; Scholl BJ Cogn Psychol; 2009 Sep; 59(2):154-79. PubMed ID: 19500784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prioritization of looming and receding objects: equal slopes, different intercepts. Skarratt PA; Cole GG; Gellatly AR Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):964-70. PubMed ID: 19429972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Redundancy effects of a moving distractor generated by alerting and orienting. Utochkin IS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1825-30. PubMed ID: 19933565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Judgments of synchrony between auditory and moving or still visual stimuli. Fouriezos G; Capstick G; Monette F; Bellemare C; Parkinson M; Dumoulin A Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):277-92. PubMed ID: 18266504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: the efficiency of selective inhibition. Hay JL; Milders MM; Sahraie A; Niedeggen M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):885-907. PubMed ID: 16846286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Motion fading and the motion aftereffect share a common process of neural adaptation. Hsieh PJ; Tse PU Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):724-33. PubMed ID: 19429955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is top-down about contingent capture? Belopolsky AV; Schreij D; Theeuwes J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):326-41. PubMed ID: 20139449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bottom-up processing of curvilinear visual features is sufficient for animate/inanimate object categorization. Zachariou V; Del Giacco AC; Ungerleider LG; Yue X J Vis; 2018 Nov; 18(12):3. PubMed ID: 30458511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How do changes in speed affect the perception of duration? Matthews WJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1617-27. PubMed ID: 21517218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Animate Objects are Detected More Frequently than Inanimate Objects in Inattentional Blindness Tasks Independently of Threat. Calvillo DP; Hawkins WC J Gen Psychol; 2016; 143(2):101-15. PubMed ID: 27055078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discrimination of animate and inanimate motion in 9-month-old infants: an ERP study. Kaduk K; Elsner B; Reid VM Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Oct; 6():14-22. PubMed ID: 23811318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Make the first move: how infants learn about self-propelled objects. Rakison DH Dev Psychol; 2006 Sep; 42(5):900-12. PubMed ID: 16953695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Goal attribution to schematic animals: do 6-month-olds perceive biological motion as animate? Schlottmann A; Ray E Dev Sci; 2010 Jan; 13(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 20121858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Causal perception of action-and-reaction sequences in 8- to 10-month-olds. Schlottmann A; Surian L; Ray ED J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 May; 103(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 18973908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of uncertainty in the systematic spatial mislocalization of moving objects. Brenner E; van Beers RJ; Rotman G; Smeets JB J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):811-25. PubMed ID: 16846281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]