These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20974713)

  • 21. Do new objects capture attention?
    Franconeri SL; Hollingworth A; Simons DJ
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Apr; 16(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 15828974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. No-onset looming motion guides spatial attention.
    von Mühlenen A; Lleras A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 18085944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contribution of bottom-up and top-down motion processes to perceived position.
    Whitney D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1380-97. PubMed ID: 17154779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A new object captures attention--but only when you know which objects are old.
    Chua FK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):797-808. PubMed ID: 21264698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Producing and processing self-propelled motion in infancy.
    Cicchino JB; Rakison DH
    Dev Psychol; 2008 Sep; 44(5):1232-41. PubMed ID: 18793057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Examining the activity-distribution model of visual attention with exogenous cues and targets.
    Pratt J; Quilty L
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):627-41. PubMed ID: 12047063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Functional relations trump implied motion in recovery from extinction: evidence from the effects of animacy on extinction.
    Riddoch MJ; Riveros R; Humphreys GW
    Neurocase; 2011 Feb; 17(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 20672224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visual information about moving objects.
    Todd JT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Aug; 7(4):975-810. PubMed ID: 6457104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The importance of being expert: top-down attentional control in visual search with photographs.
    Hershler O; Hochstein S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1478-86. PubMed ID: 19801608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are visual features of a looming or receding object processed in a capacity-free manner?
    Kahan TA; Colligan SM; Wiedman JN
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1761-7. PubMed ID: 21334924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Animacy increases second target reporting in a rapid serial visual presentation task.
    Guerrero G; Calvillo DP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1832-1838. PubMed ID: 27112561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient?
    Pinto Y; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16478326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Temporal frequency modulates reaction time responses to first-order and second-order motion.
    Hutchinson CV; Ledgeway T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1325-32. PubMed ID: 20718570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cortical area MSTd combines visual cues to represent 3-D self-movement.
    Logan DJ; Duffy CJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Oct; 16(10):1494-507. PubMed ID: 16339087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Change blindness and visual memory: visual representations get rich and act poor.
    Varakin DA; Levin DT
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):51-77. PubMed ID: 16464287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location.
    van Dam WO; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1184-92. PubMed ID: 20718565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Parallel processing in a multifeature whole-report paradigm.
    Kyllingsbaek S; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):64-82. PubMed ID: 17311480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differences in recognition and impressions of animate and inanimate objects in which features are deleted or added.
    Ando M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Jun; 90(3 Pt 2):1079-90. PubMed ID: 10939052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Seeing while acting: hand movements can modulate attentional capture by motion onset.
    Gozli DG; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2448-56. PubMed ID: 21870205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
    Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1725-9. PubMed ID: 20952771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.