These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20976795)

  • 1. Powerful multi-marker association tests: unifying genomic distance-based regression and logistic regression.
    Han F; Pan W
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 34(7):680-8. PubMed ID: 20976795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-marker and two-marker association tests for unphased case-control genotype data, with a power comparison.
    Kim S; Morris NJ; Won S; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 34(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 19557751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between genomic distance-based regression and kernel machine regression for multi-marker association testing.
    Pan W
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 May; 35(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 21308765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A unified framework for detecting genetic association with multiple SNPs in a candidate gene or region: contrasting genotype scores and LD patterns between cases and controls.
    Pan W
    Hum Hered; 2010; 69(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19797904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of multimarker logistic regression models, with application to a genomewide scan of schizophrenia.
    Wason JM; Dudbridge F
    BMC Genet; 2010 Sep; 11():80. PubMed ID: 20828390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new association test to test multiple-marker association.
    Wang X; Zhang S; Sha Q
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 18720476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The expected power of genome-wide linkage disequilibrium testing using single nucleotide polymorphism markers for detecting a low-frequency disease variant.
    Ohashi J; Tokunaga K
    Ann Hum Genet; 2002 Jul; 66(Pt 4):297-306. PubMed ID: 12418970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semiparametric Allelic Tests for Mapping Multiple Phenotypes: Binomial Regression and Mahalanobis Distance.
    Majumdar A; Witte JS; Ghosh S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 39(8):635-50. PubMed ID: 26493781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A powerful score test to detect positive selection in genome-wide scans.
    Zhong M; Lange K; Papp JC; Fan R
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2010 Oct; 18(10):1148-59. PubMed ID: 20461112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of linkage disequilibrium measures between multi-allelic markers as predictors of linkage disequilibrium between markers and QTL.
    Zhao H; Nettleton D; Soller M; Dekkers JC
    Genet Res; 2005 Aug; 86(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 16181525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulating autosomal genotypes with realistic linkage disequilibrium and a spiked-in genetic effect.
    Shi M; Umbach DM; Wise AS; Weinberg CR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):2. PubMed ID: 29291710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Permutation-based approaches do not adequately allow for linkage disequilibrium in gene-wide multi-locus association analysis.
    Moskvina V; Schmidt KM; Vedernikov A; Owen MJ; Craddock N; Holmans P; O'Donovan MC
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2012 Aug; 20(8):890-6. PubMed ID: 22317971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of linkage disequilibrium measures between multi-allelic markers as predictors of linkage disequilibrium between single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Zhao H; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC
    Genet Res; 2007 Feb; 89(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 17517154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The power of independent types of genetic information to detect association in a case-control study design.
    Won S; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 32(8):731-56. PubMed ID: 18481783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regression-based approach for testing the association between multi-region haplotype configuration and complex trait.
    Hu Y; Jason S; Wang Q; Pan Y; Zhang X; Zhao H; Li C; Sun L
    BMC Genet; 2009 Sep; 10():56. PubMed ID: 19761592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An improved score test for genetic association studies.
    Sha Q; Zhang Z; Zhang S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Jul; 35(5):350-9. PubMed ID: 21484862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-marker linkage disequilibrium mapping of quantitative trait loci.
    Lee S; Yang J; Huang J; Chen H; Hou W; Wu S
    Brief Bioinform; 2017 Mar; 18(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 26966282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A joint association test for multiple SNPs in genetic case-control studies.
    Wang T; Jacob H; Ghosh S; Wang X; Zeng ZB
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):151-63. PubMed ID: 18770519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of association methods for dense marker data.
    Bacanu SA; Nelson MR; Ehm MG
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 32(8):791-9. PubMed ID: 18551558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.