BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20977183)

  • 1. Biobanking, public consultation, and the discursive logics of deliberation: five lessons from British Columbia.
    Walmsley H
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Jul; 19(4):452-68. PubMed ID: 20977183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Engaging the public on biobanks: outcomes of the BC biobank deliberation.
    O'Doherty KC; Burgess MM
    Public Health Genomics; 2009; 12(4):203-15. PubMed ID: 19367089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recruiting for representation in public deliberation on the ethics of biobanks.
    Longstaff H; Burgess MM
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Mar; 19(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 20533799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stock options, tax credits or employment contracts please! The value of deliberative public disagreement about human tissue donation.
    Walmsley HL
    Soc Sci Med; 2011 Jul; 73(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 21683492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Australian approach to the policy translation of deliberated citizen perspectives on biobanking.
    Molster C; Maxwell S; Youngs L; Potts A; Kyne G; Hope F; Dawkins H; O'Leary P
    Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 22179074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: were theoretical principles achievable in practice?
    Molster C; Maxwell S; Youngs L; Kyne G; Hope F; Dawkins H; O'Leary P
    Health Expect; 2013 Jun; 16(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 21645188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy.
    Burgess MM
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 24434712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In the public interest: assessing expert and stakeholder influence in public deliberation about biobanks.
    MacLean S; Burgess MM
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Jul; 19(4):486-96. PubMed ID: 20977185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation.
    O'Doherty KC; Hawkins AK; Burgess MM
    Soc Sci Med; 2012 Nov; 75(9):1604-11. PubMed ID: 22867865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement.
    Burgess M; O'Doherty K; Secko D
    Per Med; 2008 May; 5(3):285-296. PubMed ID: 29783499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate.
    Secko DM; Preto N; Niemeyer S; Burgess MM
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(4):781-9. PubMed ID: 19095337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Partnering with First Nations in Northern British Columbia Canada to Reduce Inequity in Access to Genomic Research.
    Caron NR; Adam W; Anderson K; Boswell BT; Chongo M; Deineko V; Dick A; Hall SE; Hatcher JT; Howard P; Hunt M; Linn K; O'Neill A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 May; 20(10):. PubMed ID: 37239512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trade-offs, fairness, and funding for cancer drugs: key findings from a deliberative public engagement event in British Columbia, Canada.
    Bentley C; Costa S; Burgess MM; Regier D; McTaggart-Cowan H; Peacock SJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 May; 18(1):339. PubMed ID: 29739463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influencing health policy through public deliberation: Lessons learned from two decades of Citizens'/community juries.
    Degeling C; Rychetnik L; Street J; Thomas R; Carter SM
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Apr; 179():166-171. PubMed ID: 28285232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Community engagement for big epidemiology: deliberative democracy as a tool.
    McWhirter RE; Critchley CR; Nicol D; Chalmers D; Whitton T; Otlowski M; Burgess MM; Dickinson JL
    J Pers Med; 2014 Nov; 4(4):459-74. PubMed ID: 25563457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial.
    Carman KL; Mallery C; Maurer M; Wang G; Garfinkel S; Yang M; Gilmore D; Windham A; Ginsburg M; Sofaer S; Gold M; Pathak-Sen E; Davies T; Siegel J; Mangrum R; Fernandez J; Richmond J; Fishkin J; Siu Chao A
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 May; 133():11-20. PubMed ID: 25828260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The public and public health organizations: issues for community engagement in public health.
    Scutchfield FD; Hall L; Ireson CL
    Health Policy; 2006 Jun; 77(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 16139924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Science and deliberation].
    Ravazzi S
    Epidemiol Prev; 2008; 32(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 19353967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research.
    Degeling C; Carter SM; Rychetnik L
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Apr; 131():114-21. PubMed ID: 25770463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From authoritarian enclave to deliberative space: governance logics in post-disaster reconstruction.
    Curato N
    Disasters; 2018 Oct; 42(4):635-654. PubMed ID: 29484700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.