These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20977234)

  • 1. GAPE: an improved genetic algorithm for pharmacophore elucidation.
    Jones G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Nov; 50(11):2001-18. PubMed ID: 20977234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Elucidating molecular overlays from pairwise alignments using a genetic algorithm.
    Jones G; Gao Y; Sage CR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1847-55. PubMed ID: 19537722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.
    Jones G; Willett P; Glen RC; Leach AR; Taylor R
    J Mol Biol; 1997 Apr; 267(3):727-48. PubMed ID: 9126849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
    Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting the accuracy of ligand overlay methods with Random Forest models.
    Nandigam RK; Evans DA; Erickson JA; Kim S; Sutherland JJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2386-94. PubMed ID: 19053524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An extensive and diverse set of molecular overlays for the validation of pharmacophore programs.
    Giangreco I; Cosgrove DA; Packer MJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):852-66. PubMed ID: 23565904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
    Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
    Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A pharmacophore map of small molecule protein kinase inhibitors.
    McGregor MJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2374-82. PubMed ID: 17941626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and benchmarking of TASSER(iter) for the iterative improvement of protein structure predictions.
    Lee SY; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 17469193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GRID-based three-dimensional pharmacophores II: PharmBench, a benchmark data set for evaluating pharmacophore elucidation methods.
    Cross S; Ortuso F; Baroni M; Costa G; Distinto S; Moraca F; Alcaro S; Cruciani G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2599-608. PubMed ID: 22970854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiobjective optimization of pharmacophore hypotheses: bias toward low-energy conformations.
    Gardiner EJ; Cosgrove DA; Taylor R; Gillet VJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2761-73. PubMed ID: 19908873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ph4Dock: pharmacophore-based protein-ligand docking.
    Goto J; Kataoka R; Hirayama N
    J Med Chem; 2004 Dec; 47(27):6804-11. PubMed ID: 15615529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting multiple ligand binding modes using self-consistent pharmacophore hypotheses.
    Wallach I; Lilien R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep; 49(9):2116-28. PubMed ID: 19711952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel exhaustive search algorithm for predicting the conformation of polypeptide segments in proteins.
    Deane CM; Blundell TL
    Proteins; 2000 Jul; 40(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 10813838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Form follows function: shape analysis of protein cavities for receptor-based drug design.
    Weisel M; Proschak E; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    Proteomics; 2009 Jan; 9(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 19142949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A self-organizing algorithm for molecular alignment and pharmacophore development.
    Bandyopadhyay D; Agrafiotis DK
    J Comput Chem; 2008 Apr; 29(6):965-82. PubMed ID: 17999384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ParaDockS: a framework for molecular docking with population-based metaheuristics.
    Meier R; Pippel M; Brandt F; Sippl W; Baldauf C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 May; 50(5):879-89. PubMed ID: 20415499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ProMate: a structure based prediction program to identify the location of protein-protein binding sites.
    Neuvirth H; Raz R; Schreiber G
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Apr; 338(1):181-99. PubMed ID: 15050833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EADock: docking of small molecules into protein active sites with a multiobjective evolutionary optimization.
    Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
    Proteins; 2007 Jun; 67(4):1010-25. PubMed ID: 17380512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.