These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20978337)

  • 1. Isometric strength assessment, part I: static testing does not accurately predict dynamic lifting capacity.
    Feeler L; St James JD; Schapmire DW
    Work; 2010; 37(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 20978337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Isometric strength assessment, Part II: Static testing does not accurately classify validity of effort.
    Townsend R; Schapmire DW; St James J; Feeler L
    Work; 2010; 37(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 21099013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity.
    Dempsey PG; Ayoub MM; Westfall PH
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1222-41. PubMed ID: 9715677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Static and dynamic lifting strength at different reach distances in symmetrical and asymmetrical planes.
    Kumar S; Garand D
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):861-80. PubMed ID: 1633793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of lumbar belts on isolated lumbar muscle. Strength and dynamic capacity.
    Reyna JR; Leggett SH; Kenney K; Holmes B; Mooney V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jan; 20(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 7709282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test-retest reliability of isometric and isoinertial testing in symmetric and asymmetric lifting.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jul; 41(7):1050-9. PubMed ID: 9674377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Criterion-related validity of functional capacity evaluation lifting tests on future work disability risk and return to work in the construction industry.
    Gouttebarge V; Kuijer PP; Wind H; van Duivenbooden C; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
    Occup Environ Med; 2009 Oct; 66(10):657-63. PubMed ID: 19468014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling of functional trunk muscle performance: interfacing ergonomics and spine rehabilitation in response to the ADA.
    Khalaf KA; Parnianpour M; Sparto PJ; Simon SR
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1997 Oct; 34(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 9323649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strength training for the young athlete.
    Young WK; Metzl JD
    Pediatr Ann; 2010 May; 39(5):293-9. PubMed ID: 20506983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional assessment for prediction of lifting capacity.
    Wheeler DL; Graves JE; Miller GJ; O'Connor P; MacMillan M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 May; 19(9):1021-6. PubMed ID: 8029735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Post-offer, pre-placement testing in industry.
    Harbin G; Olson J
    Am J Ind Med; 2005 Apr; 47(4):296-307. PubMed ID: 15776470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Isometric muscle strength measurements and assessment: a pilot study].
    Xiao GB; Lei L; Dempsey PG; Lu BB; Liang YX
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2005 Dec; 23(6):401-4. PubMed ID: 16405767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Isokinetic and isometric muscle strength in a healthy population with special reference to age and gender.
    Danneskiold-Samsøe B; Bartels EM; Bülow PM; Lund H; Stockmarr A; Holm CC; Wätjen I; Appleyard M; Bliddal H
    Acta Physiol (Oxf); 2009 Oct; 197 Suppl 673():1-68. PubMed ID: 19744082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resistance training and neuromuscular performance in seniors.
    Granacher U; Gruber M; Gollhofer A
    Int J Sports Med; 2009 Sep; 30(9):652-7. PubMed ID: 19569007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Muscle fatigue and fatigue-related biomechanical changes during a cyclic lifting task.
    Bonato P; Ebenbichler GR; Roy SH; Lehr S; Posch M; Kollmitzer J; Della Croce U
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1810-20. PubMed ID: 12923468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of single and multi-joint lower extremity muscle strength on the functional capacity and ADL/IADL status in Japanese community-dwelling older adults.
    Azegami M; Ohira M; Miyoshi K; Kobayashi C; Hongo M; Yanagihashi R; Sadoyama T
    Nurs Health Sci; 2007 Sep; 9(3):168-76. PubMed ID: 17688474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of a new instrument for measuring plantarflexor muscle strength.
    Ortqvist M; Gutierrez-Farewik EM; Farewik M; Jansson A; Bartonek A; Broström E
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Sep; 88(9):1164-70. PubMed ID: 17826463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximum isoinertial lifting capabilities for different lifting ranges and container dimensions.
    Lee TH
    Appl Ergon; 2005 May; 36(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 15854581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of dynamic, static, and psychophysical evaluations of human strength capabilities.
    Atuahene F; Freivalds A
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1987 Dec; 16(2):179-91. PubMed ID: 3503084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneous bilateral hand strength testing in a client population, Part II: Relationship to a distraction-based lifting evaluation.
    St James JD; Schapmire DW; Feeler L; Kleinkort J
    Work; 2010; 37(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 21099014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.