These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20978643)

  • 1. Marginal adaptation of large adhesive class IV composite restorations before and after artificial aging.
    Ardu S; Stavridakis M; Feilzer AJ; Krejci I; Lefever D; Dietschi D
    J Adhes Dent; 2011 Oct; 13(5):425-31. PubMed ID: 20978643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal adaptation of an etch-and-rinse adhesive with a new type of solvent in class II cavities after artificial aging.
    Manhart J; Trumm C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Dec; 14(6):699-705. PubMed ID: 19937075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The competition between enamel and dentin adhesion within a cavity: an in vitro evaluation of class V restorations.
    Bortolotto T; Doudou W; Kunzelmann KH; Krejci I
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1125-35. PubMed ID: 22015462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention loss of class v restorations after artificial aging.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Dec; 12(6):443-9. PubMed ID: 21246065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro marginal adaptation of high-viscosity resin composite restorations bonded to dentin cavities.
    Rahiotis C; Tzoutzas J; Kakaboura A
    J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 15119587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of curing unit and adhesive system on marginal adaptation of composite restorations.
    Casselli DS; Faria-e-Silva AL; Casselli H; Martins LR
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):e408-12. PubMed ID: 23220321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
    Aggarwal V; Logani A; Jain V; Shah N
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect on shear bond strength of rewetting dry dentin with two desensitizers.
    Al Qahtani MQ; Platt JA; Moore BK; Cochran MA
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 12760701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal adaptation of class V restorations with current-generation dentin-bonding agents: effect of different dentin surface treatments.
    Cavalheiro JP; Tonetto MR; Borges ÁH; Bandéca MC; dos Santos RS; de Campos EA; Saad JR; Dantas AA; de Andrade MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 May; 15(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 25307816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
    Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal and internal adaptation of class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement.
    Dietschi D; Monasevic M; Krejci I; Davidson C
    J Dent; 2002; 30(5-6):259-69. PubMed ID: 12450717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive.
    Peumans M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Feb; 9(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 17432395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of microleakage in cervical margins of various posterior restorative systems.
    Bedran de Castro AK; Pimenta LA; Amaral CM; Ambrosano GM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 12008798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of eugenol-containing sealer on marginal adaptation of dentine-bonded resin fillings.
    Peters O; Göhring TN; Lutz F
    Int Endod J; 2000 Jan; 33(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 11307474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.
    Krifka S; Federlin M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1117-24. PubMed ID: 21947906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro.
    Frankenberger R; Hehn J; Hajtó J; Krämer N; Naumann M; Koch A; Roggendorf MJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 22358378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.